Cybersecurity Bill Nears Crucial Senate Vote
Privacy advocates warn CISA could funnel more private information into the hands of NSA.
The SenÂate on TuesÂday took up a conÂtroÂverÂsiÂal cyÂberÂseÂcurÂity bill that has drawn the ire of priÂvacy adÂvocÂates.
SenÂate MaÂjorÂity LeadÂer Mitch McÂConÂnell moved to open deÂbate on the CyÂberÂseÂcurÂity InÂformÂaÂtion SharÂing Act, or CISA, which would enÂcourÂage private comÂpanÂies to share inÂformÂaÂtion about cyÂberÂthreats with each othÂer and with the fedÂerÂal govÂernÂment.
“We inÂtend to pass the cyÂberÂseÂcurÂity bill,” McÂConÂnell told reÂportÂers TuesÂday. “It enÂjoys sigÂniÂficÂant biÂparÂtisÂan supÂport, and we think it’s imÂportÂant. And we inÂtend to see it through to comÂpleÂtion hopeÂfully early next week.”
SupÂportÂers say the bill would be a cruÂcial tool for thwartÂing inÂcreasÂingly damÂaging cyÂberÂatÂtacks, like the ones on Sony PicÂtures and the OfÂfice of PerÂsonÂnel ManÂageÂment. But priÂvacy adÂvocÂates warn it could give the NaÂtionÂal SeÂcurÂity Agency acÂcess to vast new amounts of perÂsonÂal inÂformÂaÂtion on AmerÂicÂans.
BeÂfore leavÂing for the AuÂgust reÂcess, senÂatÂors reached an agreeÂment to vote on the bill as well as 22 amendÂments, which touch on everything from priÂvacy proÂtecÂtions for inÂdiÂviduÂals to liÂabÂilÂity proÂtecÂtions for comÂpanÂies. The vote, however, was postÂponed, as the SenÂate dealt with othÂer time-sensÂitÂive isÂsues like the debt ceilÂing and PresÂidÂent Obama’s nucÂleÂar deal with IrÂan.
With no time agreeÂment, votÂing on 22 amendÂments could take far more time than the SenÂate has to spare. For that reasÂon, the bill’s co-sponÂsors, Sens. Richard Burr and DiÂanne FeinÂstein—chairÂman and rankÂing memÂber of the SenÂate InÂtelÂliÂgence ComÂmitÂtee, reÂspectÂively—worked with othÂer senÂatÂors to bundle a numÂber of amendÂments toÂgethÂer inÂto a single “manÂager’s” amendÂment.
Burr and FeinÂstein packed eight of the othÂer proÂposed amendÂments inÂto their manÂager’s amendÂment, leavÂing the rest to reÂceive inÂdiÂviduÂal votes. Burr said that he and FeinÂstein deÂcided those amendÂments imÂproved their bill and that they had agreed to opÂpose the rest.
The co-sponÂsors also adÂded six changes that were not a part of the unÂanÂimÂous-conÂsent agreeÂment, a spokesÂman for FeinÂstein said TuesÂday.
“Let’s end this proÂcess in a matÂter of days,” Burr said on the SenÂate floor. “We’ve proÂposed to vote on every amendÂment.”
But when the InÂtelÂliÂgence ComÂmitÂtee chairÂman asked for unÂanÂimÂous conÂsent to vote on the bill and its amendÂments on Thursday, he was stopped by Sen. Ron Wyden, a leadÂing critÂic of CISA. Wyden said one of the amendÂments—a change put forÂward by Sen. ShelÂdon WhiteÂhouse that would inÂcrease the crimÂinÂal penÂalÂties for hackÂing—would “sigÂniÂficÂantly exÂpand a badly outÂdated ComÂputer Fraud and AbÂuse Act.”
A group of seÂcurÂity exÂperts and civil-liberÂties orÂganÂizÂaÂtions wrote an open letÂter TuesÂday opÂposÂing the WhiteÂhouse amendÂment, which they say would “alÂter the CFAA in danÂgerÂous and unÂpreÂdictÂable ways.” They say the change would furÂther put a damper on leÂgitÂimÂate comÂputer reÂsearch and would exÂpand penÂalÂties for low-level comÂputer crime.
Burr urged Wyden to reÂconÂsider and alÂlow every amendÂment to reÂceive a vote. “If we can’t move forÂward with a proÂcess like that, then it’s difÂfiÂcult to see how in a reasÂonÂable amount of time, we can comÂplete this agenda,” he said.
Wyden’s opÂposÂiÂtion to CISA at large, which largely stems from his worry that the bill inÂcludes inÂadÂequate priÂvacy proÂtecÂtions, is shared by priÂvacy adÂvocÂates and civil-liberÂties orÂganÂizÂaÂtions, as well as a growÂing numÂber of tech comÂpanÂies. PromÂinÂent tech asÂsoÂciÂation CCIA—which repÂresÂents Google, FaceÂbook, Amazon, and othÂers—came out against the bill last week, as inÂdiÂviduÂal comÂpanÂies like TwitÂter, Yelp, and WikiÂmeÂdia also voiced their opÂposÂiÂtion.
But their call to opÂpose CISA is countered by groups like the U.S. ChamÂber of ComÂmerce and the FinÂanÂcial SerÂvices Roundtable, which have been actÂively lobÂbyÂing to pass a piece of leÂgisÂlaÂtion they say is esÂsenÂtial to strengthÂenÂing cyÂberÂseÂcurÂity for the private secÂtor and govÂernÂment both.
If the SenÂate’s cyÂberÂseÂcurÂity bill were to pass, it still would have to be aligned with two simÂilÂar—but not identÂicÂal—inÂformÂaÂtion-sharÂing bills that passed the House earliÂer this year.
NEXT STORY: DHS chief defends China cyber accord




