Advancements in 3D printing continue.
A new method 3D-prints large and complex parts more cheaply than current methods.
“We have more tests to run to understand the strength and geometric potential of the parts we can make, but as long as those elements are there, we believe this could be a game changer for the industry,” says Jeremy Cleeman, a graduate student researcher at the Rutgers School of Engineering and the lead author of the study in the journal Additive Manufacturing.
The new approach, called Multiplexed Fused Filament Fabrication (MF3), uses a single gantry, the sliding structure on a 3D printer, to print individual or multiple parts simultaneously. By programming their prototype to move in efficient patterns, and by using a series of small nozzles—rather than a single large nozzle, as is common in conventional printing—to deposit molten material, the researchers were able to increase printing resolution and size as well as significantly decrease printing time.
“MF3 will change how thermo-plastic printing is done,” says Cleeman, who notes that his team has applied for a United States patent for their technology.
The 3D-printing industry has struggled with what is known as the throughput-resolution tradeoff—the speed at which 3D printers deposit material versus the resolution of the finished product. Larger-diameter nozzles are faster than smaller ones but generate more ridges and contours that must be smoothed out later, adding significant post-production costs.
By contrast, smaller nozzles deposit material with greater resolution, but current methods with conventional software are too slow to be cost effective.
At the heart of MF3’s innovation is its software. To program a 3D printer, engineers use a software tool called a slicer—computer code that maps an object into the virtual “slices,” or layers, that will be printed. The researchers wrote slicer software that optimized the gantry arm’s movement and determined when the nozzles should turn on and off to achieve the highest efficiency. MF3’s new “toolpath strategy” makes it possible to “concurrently print multiple, geometrically distinct, non-contiguous parts of varying sizes” using a single printer, the researchers write in the study.
Cleeman says he sees numerous benefits to this technology. For one, the hardware used in MF3 can be purchased off the shelf and doesn’t need to be customized, making potential adoption easier.
Additionally, because the nozzles can be turned on and off independently, an MF3 printer has built-in resiliency, making it less prone to costly downtime, Cleeman says. For instance, when a nozzle fails in a conventional printer, the printing process must be halted. In MF3 printing, the work of a malfunctioning nozzle can be assumed by another nozzle on the same arm.
As 3D printing increases in popularity—for manufacturing and particularly for the prototyping of new products—resolving the throughput-resolution trade-off is essential, says Cleeman, adding that MF3 is a major contribution to this effort.