Business Process: Brett Champlin
Business process management “deal(s) with the perceived amounts of waste” in government, says Brett Champlin, president of the Association of Business Management Professionals, a vendor-neutral nonprofit group. Champlin answered questions in a GCN Forum June 7. <a href="http://www.gcn.com/forum/qna_forum/25946-2.html"><b>Transcript</a></b>
GCN.com:
Lloyd Batzler - GCN.com:
Welcome to our forum with Brett Champlin of the Association of Business Management Professionals. Hell take your questions for the next hour. To read more about the organization, see its web site, abpmp.org.
To set the scene, let me start with two questions: You recently attended an international BPM conference in London. What are some of the trends emerging in the industry these days? And how are business-process practices being adopted by governments, both here in the United States and overseas?
Brett Champlin:
Hi Lloyd,
Thanks for inviting me to participate in this forum. One of the major trends in BPM is a recognition of the convergence of several previously independent approaches to information and technolgoy management to focus on the business process management (BPM), specifically, business rules, business intelligence, workflow, and content mangement.
I think it has become evident to practitioners that while each of these technologies can be useful, they achieve real value when tied to process performance management. The other major trend is that hundreds of vendors in various specialties are repositioning their products and extending their product lines to recognize BPM and fit into a BPM solution architecture. (see http://www.bijonline.com/BPMWallChart.asp )
It seemed that there was a general feeling in Europe that they are ahead of us in recognizing the value process management and BPM systems, especially in government.
I have seen an increase in the number of people from government attending BPM conferences (BrainsStorm, IDS-Scheer for example). A few have projects underway, but most seem to be just "kicking the tires".
McLEAN:
Brett Champlin:
Tom Douglas, Cleveland:
Brett Champlin:
We've been seeing people like Tom Davenport and Michael Hammer coming back into the process management dialog and pointing to the mistakes that were made with BPR and acknowledging that there is more to it than they thought. They also point out, correctly, that there was an awful lot of misunderstanding or just plain mis-labeling going on - BPR was not supposed to be synonomous with layoffs and downsizing.
One thing that is new and different is better tools and a better understanding of how to apply them. BPM is more about management having the data and the tools to actually visualize and measure the end-to-end business process and not manage from a functional efficiency perspective which suboptimizes the business process. BPM is about focusing process performance first on what is of value to the customer and gaining a deep understanding of what contributes to that.
Boston MA 02134:
Brett Champlin:
Six Sigma is, as one anlayst said, "An inch wide and a mile deep approach to improvement". I think Six Sigma is great in its focus on measurement and the voice of the customer, but it is pretty much universally applied to narrow functional problems as opposed to end-to-end business processes. And, from the evidence I've seen, it hasn't been as successful in many organizations in creating a lasting process management function. It seems to foster a small project hit and run mentality in most companies as opposed to GE for example. Many manufacturing organizations have paired Six Sigma with LEAN to offset some of the deficiencies of 6S.
The TQM approach, likewise, was that "Everything, all work, is a process". It is an incremental process improvement approach. This a great approach when you already have a high performance, well documented, measured and managed process in place, but unfortunately it doesn't help very much if you are missing all of that.
BPM is about having a process management process and using information and technology to focus on process - not functional - performance.
Fairfax, Va:
Lloyd Batzler:
Brett Champlin:
I understand your point. I think that there have been some efforts in the past to do what we now call "BPM", but from my observations, the ones that were successful were exceptions, most of them were focused on automation of the process and not on creating sytems to support process management. By that I mean giving tools to the process owner (or steward) to not just get a report after the fact that shows a one-dimensional view of performance (typically financial), but that lets them understand how each component of a end-to-end business process is contributing to the overall process performance with all the measures that align to the business plan. Generally BPM solutions will involve accurate and active process models, performance monitoring during operation, and business intelligence capabilities to view perfomance over time from a number of dimensions. And, the ability for the process owner to predict the effect of changes they might make and then to implement them directly.
These concepts have been successfully applied in continuous process manufacturing for a long time. But other types of business processes are much more complicated and today involve much more "knowledge work" these kinds of processes have orders of magnitude more expception processing and rules to manage. I think that is why we now have the tools and the understanding to make BPM work for a much wider spectrum of business processes today.
NYC, NY:
Brett Champlin:
Charles, Santa Fe:
Brett Champlin:
SF CA:
Brett Champlin:
Tony Bereshnyi:
Brett Champlin:
Crystal City Virginia:
Lloyd Batzler:
Brett Champlin:
Thanks, Lloyd, for pointing that out. ABPMP is vendor neutral and vendor independent.
I personally don't think that you have to have a "one-size-fits-all" approach to BPM solutions. Some products are more workflow based, some more rules based, etc. I think each solution needs to be matched to the problem, i.e., the process. Generally speaking most solutions will be a good ROI if you're applying them to a real process problem.
Ron Pearce:
Brett Champlin:
Lloyd Batzler:
Brett Champlin:
Lloyd Batzler:
Brett Champlin:
The Association of Business Process Management Professionals is co-chairing the Brainstorm BPM conference series. The first was in Chicago in April. Next is San Francisco, June 21-23. The final conference this year will be held in New York, November 4-5. Our Chicago, Philadelphia and San Francisco Chapters all have ongoing programs locally. We will have chapters coming "online" in Atlanta, Boston, and Detroit hopefully by the end of the year. Id like to invite everyone who participated in this forum to visit our website at www.abpmp.org and consider joining.
Thanks for having me.
Brett
Pittsburgh:
Brett Champlin:
Lloyd Batzler:




