recommended reading

In Most Hacks, ‘the Common Denominator' is People


Congress asked industry tech leaders to offer insights for how the government might reduce the number of data breaches and shore up its cybersecurity posture.

Predictably, much of the discussion centered on tech leaders encouraging government to invest more money in cybersecurity, but for cash-strapped agencies, that may not be an option. Private sector companies spend more – sometimes as much as three times more, according to John Wood, chief executive officer of Telos Corporation – on cybersecurity than their public sector counterparts.

That’s a scary thought, but here’s another: The latest and greatest technology means absolutely nothing if your workforce isn’t properly trained and competent regarding the Internet.

“The overwhelming common denominator was people,” Wood said, speaking about a number of large-scale data breaches in retailers like Target and Neiman Marcus as well as the Office of Personnel Management hack that exposed personal information on more than 21 million past, current and prospective employees.

“Nearly all of these breaches could have been avoided,” Wood added.

Wood submitted a makeshift blueprint in his testimony for federal agencies to shore up their systems similar to policy efforts called for by U.S. Chief Information Officer Tony Scott in the “cybersecurity sprint.” They include establishing and enforcing cybersecurity policies and procedures, effective password management, proper training and routine patching and up-to-date endpoint solutions.

These common-sense efforts are cheap and promote improved cybersecurity posture. Had OPM followed them, perhaps we all wouldn’t be talking about it.

“At the risk of being a Monday-morning quarterback, in retrospect, had OPM been using two-factor authentications, encryption rest, and had they had log files, we would have a much different situation than perhaps we ended up having,” Wood said.

(Image via /

Threatwatch Alert

Thousands of cyber attacks occur each day

See the latest threats


Close [ x ] More from Nextgov

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Featured Content from RSA Conference: Dissed by NIST

    Learn more about the latest draft of the U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology guidance document on authentication and lifecycle management.

  • PIV- I And Multifactor Authentication: The Best Defense for Federal Government Contractors

    This white paper explores NIST SP 800-171 and why compliance is critical to federal government contractors, especially those that work with the Department of Defense, as well as how leveraging PIV-I credentialing with multifactor authentication can be used as a defense against cyberattacks

  • Toward A More Innovative Government

    This research study aims to understand how state and local leaders regard their agency’s innovation efforts and what they are doing to overcome the challenges they face in successfully implementing these efforts.

  • From Volume to Value: UK’s NHS Digital Provides U.S. Healthcare Agencies A Roadmap For Value-Based Payment Models

    The U.S. healthcare industry is rapidly moving away from traditional fee-for-service models and towards value-based purchasing that reimburses physicians for quality of care in place of frequency of care.

  • GBC Flash Poll: Is Your Agency Safe?

    Federal leaders weigh in on the state of information security

  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.