recommended reading

Defense and the intelligence community pursue conflicting cloud plans

National Reconnaissance Office CIO Jill Singer, left, and CIA Chief Information Officer Gus Hunt at a forum hosted by Nextgov and INSA

National Reconnaissance Office CIO Jill Singer, left, and CIA Chief Information Officer Gus Hunt at a forum hosted by Nextgov and INSA // Sarah Scully/

The intelligence community and Pentagon each are developing portable technology services for exchanging information such as cyber threats -- but the arrangements are incompatible right now.

The Defense Department's "joint information environment" and the intelligence arena's "intelligence community information technology environment" share the same goal of decreasing costs and increasing security by shifting work to applications accessible on any device.  The two setups, however, are being constructed separately and differently.

"Ideally, DoD and IC will work together to de-conflict opposing perspectives on the path forward,” states a report released Tuesday by the Intelligence and National Security Alliance.

Unlike the intelligence community's architecture, Defense's project is decentralized in that there is no planned acquisition strategy or budget and is funded through military organizations that opt in, according INSA. The paper communicates the perspectives of the intelligence community's chief information officers based on interviews with senior officials.

"To date, implementation of their respective IT and telecommunications visions has consumed significant personnel and financial resources. This has limited the ability of both to coordinate their respective efforts to ensure complementary, mutually supportive efforts," according to the alliance.

Compounding difficulties, the specter of sequestration -- deep governmentwide budget cuts -- has forced both entities to draft Plan Bs for programs. "We're spending an enormous amount of time planning for sequestration in case it does happen," CIA Chief Information Officer Gus Hunt said at a forum hosted by Nextgov and INSA, where the reported was distributed. 

Presumably Defense and intelligence operations will have to coordinate their activities, with President Obama expected to issue a cybersecurity executive order on Wednesday expanding intelligence sharing with defense suppliers and other critical industries.

The Pentagon currently is running a program that provides classified information on cyber threats to cleared defense contractors and Internet service providers. The sensitive communications are provided by the National Security Agency, a hybrid military-intel organization that works closely with the rest of the intelligence community. In fact, more than 70 percent of the intelligence community falls under Defense's jurisdiction according to the alliance. 

Hunt told Nextgov that the new intelligence environment will reduce the labor involved in passing information to NSA and other parties authorized to review information about foreign threats. 

In an interview after Tuesday's event, National Reconnaissance Office CIO Jill Singer only would say that current technology already supports public-private exchanges about computer risks.

Threatwatch Alert

Thousands of cyber attacks occur each day

See the latest threats


Close [ x ] More from Nextgov

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Featured Content from RSA Conference: Dissed by NIST

    Learn more about the latest draft of the U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology guidance document on authentication and lifecycle management.

  • PIV- I And Multifactor Authentication: The Best Defense for Federal Government Contractors

    This white paper explores NIST SP 800-171 and why compliance is critical to federal government contractors, especially those that work with the Department of Defense, as well as how leveraging PIV-I credentialing with multifactor authentication can be used as a defense against cyberattacks

  • Toward A More Innovative Government

    This research study aims to understand how state and local leaders regard their agency’s innovation efforts and what they are doing to overcome the challenges they face in successfully implementing these efforts.

  • From Volume to Value: UK’s NHS Digital Provides U.S. Healthcare Agencies A Roadmap For Value-Based Payment Models

    The U.S. healthcare industry is rapidly moving away from traditional fee-for-service models and towards value-based purchasing that reimburses physicians for quality of care in place of frequency of care.

  • GBC Flash Poll: Is Your Agency Safe?

    Federal leaders weigh in on the state of information security

  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.