recommended reading

Threats lurk among Pentagon’s sprawling computer networks

Defense Department file photo

The Pentagon’s thousands of networks are indefensible against cyberattacks but no one there can keep track of all the vulnerabilities. The military aims to change that within five years.

To say the Defense Department’s information technology departments are disjointed is an understatement. According to senior Pentagon officials, duplicative networks, thousands of email servers and hundreds of data centers prevent warfighters from securely accessing information anywhere and anytime.

To heighten security and lower costs, Defense is attempting to build a “joint information environment” that would simplify military computing, officials on Tuesday told military personnel at a talk sponsored by Nextgov’s parent company Government Executive Media Group. The goal by 2017 is to consolidate information technology contracts across services, move off desktops to online services accessible from any device and create what Cyber Command calls a “cyber operational picture.”

The existing intrusion prevention system “is not providing that real-time information that we need,” Rear Adm. Marshall B. Lytle III, director of Command, Control, Communications and Computer (C4) Systems and Cyber Command chief information officer, said during an interview after the event. A comprehensive snapshot of anomalous network activities and instant Defensewide access to threat information from softer targets, such as utilities, could reveal a potential coordinated attack, he said.

Right now, the networkwide threat detector, called the Host-Based Security System, is a starting point for reaching this wide-angle view, Lytle said. The system is deployed throughout the military services and agencies but is not fully operational “with all the modules enabled,” he said. The statistics collected from many of the Defense organizations must be manually combined, Lytle added.

On Monday, Gen. Keith Alexander, head of Cyber Command, explained the difficulty of spotting cyberassaults outside the dot-mil domain.

“How do you see cyberspace?” he asked during a speech at the American Enterprise Institute, a conservative think tank. “Draw me a picture of cyberspace.”

Sharing information between the public and private sectors could help map out virtual strikes, but that concept raises concerns about militarizing the Internet. “How do we share information between the government and industry and how do we do that in such a way that the American people know we’re defending their civil liberties and privacy?” Alexander questioned, describing the problem cyberwarriors face.

Ideally, he would like Congress to pass a bill that would allow a private company to quickly tell the Pentagon the type of malicious software detected in an email, the time the message was received and perhaps the network location, or IP address, of the targeted device.

“If the critical infrastructure community is being attacked, we need somebody to tell us at network speed,” Alexander said. “It doesn’t require the government to read their email.”

“If it’s an attack on the country, you don’t want to say, ‘Oops, there went the power sector, there went the financial sector,’” he added. “The reality is it’s going to take real-time information and sharing.”

Threatwatch Alert

Thousands of cyber attacks occur each day

See the latest threats


Close [ x ] More from Nextgov

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • It’s Time for the Federal Government to Embrace Wireless and Mobility

    The United States has turned a corner on the adoption of mobile phones, tablets and other smart devices, outpacing traditional desktop and laptop sales by a wide margin. This issue brief discusses the state of wireless and mobility in federal government and outlines why now is the time to embrace these technologies in government.

  • Featured Content from RSA Conference: Dissed by NIST

    Learn more about the latest draft of the U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology guidance document on authentication and lifecycle management.

  • A New Security Architecture for Federal Networks

    Federal government networks are under constant attack, and the number of those attacks is increasing. This issue brief discusses today's threats and a new model for the future.

  • Going Agile:Revolutionizing Federal Digital Services Delivery

    Here’s one indication that times have changed: Harriet Tubman is going to be the next face of the twenty dollar bill. Another sign of change? The way in which the federal government arrived at that decision.

  • Software-Defined Networking

    So many demands are being placed on federal information technology networks, which must handle vast amounts of data, accommodate voice and video, and cope with a multitude of highly connected devices while keeping government information secure from cyber threats. This issue brief discusses the state of SDN in the federal government and the path forward.

  • The New IP: Moving Government Agencies Toward the Network of The Future

    Federal IT managers are looking to modernize legacy network infrastructures that are taxed by growing demands from mobile devices, video, vast amounts of data, and more. This issue brief discusses the federal government network landscape, as well as market, financial force drivers for network modernization.


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.