recommended reading

The FCC Thinks Netflix and Cogent Have a Point in Their Dispute With the Big Internet Providers

FCC Chairman Tom Wheeler

FCC Chairman Tom Wheeler // Susan Walsh/AP File Photo

Though it doesn’t say it in so many words, the US telecom regulator confirmed some of Netflix’s complaints about the big internet service providers

Late last week the Federal Communications Commission chair Tom Wheeler announced that its staff would be looking deeper into the world of the internet. In the past, the FCC has focused on regulating the “last mile” of the internet, between your computer and your internet service provider. That seemed fine at first—but recent evolution in the way the companies that control the internet do business behind the scenes has made “the rest of the internet” much more important to your ability to access content than it used to be.

Netflix and transit companies hired to send data around the country, like Cogent,have complained about being strong-armed into paying extra to internet service providers for taking on data-heavy traffic like video streams before they are transmitted on to consumers. The ISPs have replied that Netflix doesn’t have proof of inappropriate activity—and, regardless, it’s not its business what goes on: “Internet interconnection has nothing to do with net neutrality,” cable TV and internet provider Comcast notes in a recent rebuttal of Netflix criticism.

Comcast is right that the generally accepted standard of net neutrality hasn’t gone beyond the last mile. But in the fourth annual “Measuring Broadband America” report released this week, FCC officials recognized that what’s happening in the “rest of the internet” is affecting consumers:

While internet traffic exchange issues were not the focus of the report, we found notable anomalies as we collected speed data. In particular, we found significant drops in broadband performance during a period when Cogent, an internet backbone provider, reportedly was having disputes with various ISPs….These experiences confirm that the way ISPs exchange traffic with other networks on the Internet is critical to the consumer Internet experience.

The regulators concede that they don’t yet have enough data to understand what’s going on or finger a culprit. But this a key independent analysis saying that companies’ decisions beyond the last mile do affect users and warrant regulatory scrutiny. It’s far from a full embrace of so-called “strong net neutrality”—expanding the definition to include neutral data treatment on the rest of the internet—and it could even backfire for Netflix if the FCC agrees with the ISPs that Netflix is responsible for upgrading its connections.

But, considering the wide-spread secrecy when it comes to interconnection arrangements, it’s hard to see an expanding inquiry as a positive development for companies like Verizon or Comcast—especially as the FCC considers its merger with Time Warner Cable.

Reprinted with permission from Quartz. The original story can be found here

Threatwatch Alert

Thousands of cyber attacks occur each day

See the latest threats


Close [ x ] More from Nextgov

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • It’s Time for the Federal Government to Embrace Wireless and Mobility

    The United States has turned a corner on the adoption of mobile phones, tablets and other smart devices, outpacing traditional desktop and laptop sales by a wide margin. This issue brief discusses the state of wireless and mobility in federal government and outlines why now is the time to embrace these technologies in government.

  • Featured Content from RSA Conference: Dissed by NIST

    Learn more about the latest draft of the U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology guidance document on authentication and lifecycle management.

  • A New Security Architecture for Federal Networks

    Federal government networks are under constant attack, and the number of those attacks is increasing. This issue brief discusses today's threats and a new model for the future.

  • Going Agile:Revolutionizing Federal Digital Services Delivery

    Here’s one indication that times have changed: Harriet Tubman is going to be the next face of the twenty dollar bill. Another sign of change? The way in which the federal government arrived at that decision.

  • Software-Defined Networking

    So many demands are being placed on federal information technology networks, which must handle vast amounts of data, accommodate voice and video, and cope with a multitude of highly connected devices while keeping government information secure from cyber threats. This issue brief discusses the state of SDN in the federal government and the path forward.

  • The New IP: Moving Government Agencies Toward the Network of The Future

    Federal IT managers are looking to modernize legacy network infrastructures that are taxed by growing demands from mobile devices, video, vast amounts of data, and more. This issue brief discusses the federal government network landscape, as well as market, financial force drivers for network modernization.


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.