recommended reading

Budget authority and executive titles come in for scrutiny in IT reform debate

Caitlin Fairchild/

Government chief information officers without authority over their agencies’ technology spending are like “toothless tigers,” former Rep. Tom Davis, R-Va., testified Tuesday before the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee he once chaired.

The committee’s current chairman, Rep. Darrell Issa, R-Calif., plans to introduce legislation this Congress that would give CIOs authority over their agencies’ information technology procurement spending and reserve the title of CIO for just one person per agency.

Only Veterans Affairs CIO Roger Baker currently has budget authority. Without that authority, CIOs are handicapped in their ability to reduce wasteful spending by rescoping technology projects for shorter-term deliverables and increasing shared services, Issa has argued.

Rep. Gerry Connolly, D-Va., the ranking democrat on the Oversight subcommittee that oversees federal IT policy, has endorsed the broad outlines of Issa’s proposed bill.

The Information Technology Acquisition Advisory Council has estimated the government can save up to $20 billion of its $80 billion annual IT budget through smarter purchasing and other reforms, a figure Issa cited during Thursday’s hearings.

“It’s not the waste of that $20 billion, it’s what that $20 billion could do if properly applied,” Issa said. “The leverage of $20 billion to save $200 billion is why it’s essential we fix this part of government that seems so broken.”

The Office of Management and Budget has cited smaller potential savings from specific IT reform initiatives, such as $5 billion in savings from consolidating federal data centers.

Giving agency CIOs budget authority would solve some problems but not all of them, said David Powner, director of information technology management issues at the Government Accountability Office.

Powner’s office has consistently faulted agencies for not being sufficiently transparent about their technology spending.

Some federal departments and agencies have more than a dozen employees with the title CIO, Issa said Tuesday. That obscures lines of authority and makes it difficult to hold people accountable for waste, he said.

Issa asked federal CIO Steven VanRoekel during the hearing whether agencies may be leveraging the prestige of the CIO title and the pay it brings to lure higher-qualified people into those positions.

VanRoekel replied that lines of authority ought to be clearer in government technology shops but that the problem was more about governance than titles. One of VanRoekel’s first acts in office was issuing a memo clarifying CIO authorities.

Ensuring that specific officials are responsible for specific projects is more important than those officials’ titles, Powner said. Powner credited the Federal IT Dashboard, which ranks high-cost projects across the government, with significantly increasing accountability for those projects but noted some agency CIOs are overstating projects’ likelihood of success.

Issa’s proposed legislation would also create a Commodity IT Acquisition Center tasked with overseeing large, governmentwide IT contracts, as well as agency-based Assisted Acquisition Centers of Excellence to develop expertise and best practices in particular technology purchasing categories.

Some former acquisition officials have expressed concern the new commodity center could duplicate work already being done by the General Services Administration and a coalition of industry groups has demanded assurance the new center won’t impinge on the GSA schedules program as a condition of its support.

Schedules are essentially menus of technology goods or services contracts GSA has negotiated with core vendors. Other agencies can buy goods and services off those schedules without doing any negotiating themselves, saving time and money.

Perhaps the greatest barrier to innovation in government technology is the fault of Congress rather than agencies, former Rep. Davis testified. The fact that Congress hasn’t passed a budget in the past several years means agencies are less willing to take risks and make long-term plans, he said, a point VanRoekel and Powner agreed with.

“This is not a Republican or a Democratic issue,” Davis said. “We can argue that there’s too much or not enough government, but we want the government we’re paying for and that’s really what this is about.”

Threatwatch Alert

Thousands of cyber attacks occur each day

See the latest threats


Close [ x ] More from Nextgov

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • It’s Time for the Federal Government to Embrace Wireless and Mobility

    The United States has turned a corner on the adoption of mobile phones, tablets and other smart devices, outpacing traditional desktop and laptop sales by a wide margin. This issue brief discusses the state of wireless and mobility in federal government and outlines why now is the time to embrace these technologies in government.

  • Featured Content from RSA Conference: Dissed by NIST

    Learn more about the latest draft of the U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology guidance document on authentication and lifecycle management.

  • A New Security Architecture for Federal Networks

    Federal government networks are under constant attack, and the number of those attacks is increasing. This issue brief discusses today's threats and a new model for the future.

  • Going Agile:Revolutionizing Federal Digital Services Delivery

    Here’s one indication that times have changed: Harriet Tubman is going to be the next face of the twenty dollar bill. Another sign of change? The way in which the federal government arrived at that decision.

  • Software-Defined Networking

    So many demands are being placed on federal information technology networks, which must handle vast amounts of data, accommodate voice and video, and cope with a multitude of highly connected devices while keeping government information secure from cyber threats. This issue brief discusses the state of SDN in the federal government and the path forward.

  • The New IP: Moving Government Agencies Toward the Network of The Future

    Federal IT managers are looking to modernize legacy network infrastructures that are taxed by growing demands from mobile devices, video, vast amounts of data, and more. This issue brief discusses the federal government network landscape, as well as market, financial force drivers for network modernization.


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.