recommended reading

Federal IT Dashboard improving but still not wholly accurate

Postings to the Office of Management and Budget's Federal IT Dashboard are more accurate and timely than 18 months ago, but they still aren't giving a perfectly clear picture of government information technology spending, according to a watchdog report released Wednesday.

The Federal IT Dashboard ranks about 800 major IT projects across 27 agencies based on how close they are to cost and schedule targets.

The dashboard was one of several transparency initiatives introduced early in the Obama administration. It was also part of an initiative to reduce waste in government IT spending, which is notorious for going over budget and past deadline.

Cost ratings were accurate for four of the eight information technology projects reviewed by the Government Accountability Office, and schedule ratings were accurate for seven.

That's an improvement over GAO's last review in March, when cost ratings were inaccurate for six of 10 IT projects and schedule rankings were inaccurate for nine of 10 projects.

Most of the errors in both cases were because agencies had uploaded erroneous or incomplete project data, GAO said. All erroneous rankings in the current report were actually lower than GAO's own assessments, according to the report.

In addition to improving accuracy, GAO urged OMB to better parse out performance data so that improved projects aren't dragged down by months-old negative rankings and failing projects aren't buoyed by outdated positive rankings.

Agency chief information officers are responsible for posting monthly updates on project performance to the dashboard. Prior to the dashboard, agencies released IT project performance information quarterly.

An updated version of the dashboard is scheduled to be released in 2012.

Threatwatch Alert

Thousands of cyber attacks occur each day

See the latest threats


Close [ x ] More from Nextgov

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

  • Featured Content from RSA Conference: Dissed by NIST

    Learn more about the latest draft of the U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology guidance document on authentication and lifecycle management.

  • PIV- I And Multifactor Authentication: The Best Defense for Federal Government Contractors

    This white paper explores NIST SP 800-171 and why compliance is critical to federal government contractors, especially those that work with the Department of Defense, as well as how leveraging PIV-I credentialing with multifactor authentication can be used as a defense against cyberattacks

  • Toward A More Innovative Government

    This research study aims to understand how state and local leaders regard their agency’s innovation efforts and what they are doing to overcome the challenges they face in successfully implementing these efforts.

  • From Volume to Value: UK’s NHS Digital Provides U.S. Healthcare Agencies A Roadmap For Value-Based Payment Models

    The U.S. healthcare industry is rapidly moving away from traditional fee-for-service models and towards value-based purchasing that reimburses physicians for quality of care in place of frequency of care.

  • GBC Flash Poll: Is Your Agency Safe?

    Federal leaders weigh in on the state of information security


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.