recommended reading

Past Performance A Big Deal for Alliant 2 Competitors


Sometime in June, $65 billion in federal IT business will be up for grabs under the Alliant 2 governmentwide acquisition contracts. The requests for proposals from the General Services Administration will likely grab the attention of nearly all the major IT contractors looking to boost profits amid a contracting environment ripe with consolidation and budget tightening.

The Alliant 2 Unrestricted, with a ceiling of $50 billion over 10 years, and Alliant 2 Small Business, with its $15 billion ceiling, represent the largest IT contract of the year and perhaps of the next decade. And its objective methodology for selecting winners is likely to make it also among the most competitive.

Building on the approach GSA used in 2013’s One Acquisition Solution for Integrated Services contracts, companies will self-score relevant experience and various certifications in a points-based system set by GSA. (Brian Friel, founder of One Nation Analytics, published a thorough write-up on this process in Nextgov in March).

In short, the 60 large companies with the highest point total would win a spot on the Alliant 2 Unrestricted contract. The 80 top small business scorers would get spots on Alliant 2 Small Business.

The end result is an RFP that stresses past performance, which bodes well for established defense and IT contractors, according to Arun Sankaran, managing director at Govini, a business intelligence firm. (Govini and Government Executive Media Group have a data sharing partnership, and earlier this month released the 2016 Federal Scorecard, an annual ranking of government contractors based on more than 6,000 data points.)

“The big takeaway is that a huge chunk of Alliant 2 – 40 percent of the evaluation – will be based on past performance,” Sankaran said.

Govini’s recent analysis of the GWAC titled “A Big Data Approach to Alliant 2” details where opportunities exist – and where competition will be the toughest – among contractors via the product service codes that dictate which kinds of IT and other services have been purchased historically under RFPs. Different PSC codes refer to different kinds of work, and cataloging contractor performance this way offers many insights.

“Competition will be fierce for the 60 available spots on full and open Alliant 2, but a big data view of the competitive landscape highlights which vendors have strengths in each PSC code group,” the report states.

» Get the best federal technology news and ideas delivered right to your inbox. Sign up here.

HP, for example, is the second largest vendor by monetary capture across all PSC codes in the federal government, but the company has its most success competing for “IT services,” where 95 percent of its work comes from. Past performance is so key to Alliant 2 that contractors can build a self-evaluation strategy to “exploit PSC code selection with less competition,” the report states.

Alliant 2 is the successor to the original Alliant contract, through which federal agencies have spent more than $20 billion. As the Govini report notes, Alliant’s success helped transition some small business awardees to large businesses.

Companies like Digital Management Inc., Phacil and ActioNet have generated hundreds of millions of dollars and will “graduate to full and open” competition under Alliant 2. Those graduations coupled with industry consolidations may leave the door open for new small businesses to get their feet in Alliant 2’s door, Sankaran said.

“I think GSA is going to have to look for new faces, and it’s getting harder to find them,” Sankaran said. “A lot of acquisition has been happening in this space in the past year, and the pool to cull them from may be smaller. You may see names pop up on Alliant 2 (Small Business) that you haven’t seen before.”

Threatwatch Alert

Thousands of cyber attacks occur each day

See the latest threats


Close [ x ] More from Nextgov

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Modernizing IT for Mission Success

    Surveying Federal and Defense Leaders on Priorities and Challenges at the Tactical Edge

  • Communicating Innovation in Federal Government

    Federal Government spending on ‘obsolete technology’ continues to increase. Supporting the twin pillars of improved digital service delivery for citizens on the one hand, and the increasingly optimized and flexible working practices for federal employees on the other, are neither easy nor inexpensive tasks. This whitepaper explores how federal agencies can leverage the value of existing agency technology assets while offering IT leaders the ability to implement the kind of employee productivity, citizen service improvements and security demanded by federal oversight.

  • Effective Ransomware Response

    This whitepaper provides an overview and understanding of ransomware and how to successfully combat it.

  • Forecasting Cloud's Future

    Conversations with Federal, State, and Local Technology Leaders on Cloud-Driven Digital Transformation

  • IT Transformation Trends: Flash Storage as a Strategic IT Asset

    MIT Technology Review: Flash Storage As a Strategic IT Asset For the first time in decades, IT leaders now consider all-flash storage as a strategic IT asset. IT has become a new operating model that enables self-service with high performance, density and resiliency. It also offers the self-service agility of the public cloud combined with the security, performance, and cost-effectiveness of a private cloud. Download this MIT Technology Review paper to learn more about how all-flash storage is transforming the data center.


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.