recommended reading

Cyber an NSA, Not a DHS, Thing


By Allan Holmes March 9, 2009

recent posts

The debate over who controls cybersecurity in government is heating up. The news that Rod Beckstrom would resign this coming Friday as director of the National Cybersecurity Center elevated the struggle between who will control cybersecurity in the federal government. Beckstrom, whose center is part of the Homeland Security Department, says he was frustrated by the National Security Agency's push to control everything cyber. The last straw, evidently, is NSC's implication that the center be moved to NSA's headquarters at Fort Meade, Md.

The pushing is likely to become more like a shoving match now that "NSA Director Lt. Gen. Keith Alexander will be giving the keynote address at this year's RSA security conference," reported Wired's Threat Level blog. More from that post:

The Bush Administration frequently tried to equate crime on the internet with national security to gather support for its interest in monitoring internet activities. Alexander's RSA talk will likely continue this trend and serve to bolster the NSA's efforts to wrest control of the government's cybersecurity efforts from the Department of Homeland Security, a prospect that concerns civil liberties advocates, given the NSA's acknowledged warrantless domestic wiretapping program and allegations that the agency also secretly tapped domestic internet communications without a warrant.

DHS is likely to lose this fight - if it hasn't already. Nextgov's Jill Aitoro, in an article posted on Monday, quotes Jim Lewis, director of the technology and public policy program at the Center for Strategic and International Studies, who advised the Obama administration to establish an independent cybersecurity body, saying, "I don't think it's a tug of war between NSA and DHS, mainly because I think DHS is out of the running."

Bob Charette, a Nextgov blogger who also writes The Risk Factor blog, isn't betting on DHS coming out on top, either. He says if he were a cybersecurity center employee, "I would be figuring out commuting routes to Fort Meade."


Close [ x ] More from Nextgov

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Featured Content from RSA Conference: Dissed by NIST

    Learn more about the latest draft of the U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology guidance document on authentication and lifecycle management.

  • PIV- I And Multifactor Authentication: The Best Defense for Federal Government Contractors

    This white paper explores NIST SP 800-171 and why compliance is critical to federal government contractors, especially those that work with the Department of Defense, as well as how leveraging PIV-I credentialing with multifactor authentication can be used as a defense against cyberattacks

  • Toward A More Innovative Government

    This research study aims to understand how state and local leaders regard their agency’s innovation efforts and what they are doing to overcome the challenges they face in successfully implementing these efforts.

  • From Volume to Value: UK’s NHS Digital Provides U.S. Healthcare Agencies A Roadmap For Value-Based Payment Models

    The U.S. healthcare industry is rapidly moving away from traditional fee-for-service models and towards value-based purchasing that reimburses physicians for quality of care in place of frequency of care.

  • GBC Flash Poll: Is Your Agency Safe?

    Federal leaders weigh in on the state of information security

  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.