recommended reading

Democrats defend IT field hearing that Republicans plan to boycott

Reps. Elijah Cummings, D-Md., said Thursday that Issa was misapplying the rule because no committee members are on the ballot in the election at issue .

Reps. Elijah Cummings, D-Md., said Thursday that Issa was misapplying the rule because no committee members are on the ballot in the election at issue . // AP photo

There’s nothing unethical about an information technology-focused event that Democratic members of the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee plan to hold in Northern Virginia on May 11, the committee’s ranking member and the leading Democrat on its IT subcommittee said Thursday.

Chairman Darrell Issa, R-Calif., on April 26 declined to participate in the proposed field hearing, citing a committee rule forbidding such events within 45 days of an election being held in the host district.

Reps. Elijah Cummings, D-Md., and Gerald Connolly, D-Va., responded Thursday that Issa was misapplying the rule because no committee members are on the ballot in the election at issue -- Virginia’s June 12 primary.

Connolly is running for reelection in Virginia’s nearby 11th District, but doesn’t face a Democratic challenger and isn’t on the primary ballot.

“Out of an abundance of caution, we consulted with staff on the House Administration Committee, who also raised no objections to our current plan to hold this event as a minority forum on this date,” the Congressmen said.

Cummings is the full committee’s ranking member and Connolly is the ranking Democrat on the Oversight Subcommittee on Technology, Information Policy, Intergovernmental Relations and Procurement Reform. They said they support barring committee field hearings within 45 days of an election in which a committee member appears on the ballot and would even support extending the prohibition to 90 days.

Cummings and Connelly planned the event to gather feedback from suburban Washington IT firms on a plan to drastically reduce the number of federal data centers and other government technology initiatives, according to press releases.

Issa also complained in his letter that Connolly had not attended prior committee field hearings and the last field hearing in a Democratic committee members’ district was interrupted by protesters.

Threatwatch Alert

Thousands of cyber attacks occur each day

See the latest threats

JOIN THE DISCUSSION

Close [ x ] More from Nextgov
 
 

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from Nextgov.com.
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Featured Content from RSA Conference: Dissed by NIST

    Learn more about the latest draft of the U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology guidance document on authentication and lifecycle management.

    Download
  • PIV- I And Multifactor Authentication: The Best Defense for Federal Government Contractors

    This white paper explores NIST SP 800-171 and why compliance is critical to federal government contractors, especially those that work with the Department of Defense, as well as how leveraging PIV-I credentialing with multifactor authentication can be used as a defense against cyberattacks

    Download
  • Toward A More Innovative Government

    This research study aims to understand how state and local leaders regard their agency’s innovation efforts and what they are doing to overcome the challenges they face in successfully implementing these efforts.

    Download
  • From Volume to Value: UK’s NHS Digital Provides U.S. Healthcare Agencies A Roadmap For Value-Based Payment Models

    The U.S. healthcare industry is rapidly moving away from traditional fee-for-service models and towards value-based purchasing that reimburses physicians for quality of care in place of frequency of care.

    Download
  • GBC Flash Poll: Is Your Agency Safe?

    Federal leaders weigh in on the state of information security

    Download
  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

    Download

When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.