recommended reading

Air cargo screening lacks advanced intelligence, DHS testifies

Homeland Security Department officials on Tuesday told lawmakers they do not have enough intelligence about the contents of cargo on aircraft -- before they depart foreign countries -- to ensure that dangerous devices are not aboard planes headed for the United States.

The Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee called DHS officials to testify on the gaps in cargo screening that allowed individuals with al Qaeda ties to conceal explosive materials in U.S.-bound cargo flights originating from Yemen.

"Despite having a robust targeting system and the ability to quickly locate and inspect shipments of concern, the recent air cargo incidents have highlighted the challenges that remain in the air cargo environment," Alan Bersin, commissioner of Customs and Border Protection, and John Pistole, administrator of the Transportation Security Administration, said in joint testimony to the committee. "Specifically, receiving air cargo manifest data once a plane has already departed for the United States does not prevent dangerous materials from being loaded onto aircraft."

By law, carriers are required to submit manifest data only four hours before an aircraft arrives at a U.S. airport, or at "wheels up" for flights arriving from Canada, Mexico, Central America, points in South America north of the equator, Bermuda and the Caribbean. DHS relies on this data to identify high-risk packages and planes. The department's Automated Targeting System matches descriptions of goods that are listed in the data against other screening information, intelligence and known patterns of illicit activity.

Ranking Republican Sen. Susan Collins of Maine asked officials whether they could require advance notice of air cargo contents earlier than four hours before a plane lands. "A flight may be already en route," she said. "The four hours strikes me as something you could change immediately."

The men responded that they are working on obtaining the information sooner, but overseas companies and governments do not yet have the resources to quickly supply it.

"I could issue a security directive today and say eight hours," Pistole said. "The question is, are the carriers capable of implementing that today? Many carriers are not fully electronic. The intent is there. The question is, how do we make that happen? "

Until Tuesday, government officials had declined to offer details on what DHS Secretary Janet Napolitano meant last week when she said her department is working with international and private sector partners "on the expansion of layered detections system, including technology and other measures."

At the hearing, Bersin and Pistole explained that to thwart the attack, DHS officials and industry intercepted all cargo shipments from Yemen to hold the items for examination "using all the inspection technology at our disposal -- including X-ray systems, explosive detection canines and explosive trace detection equipment -- in addition to manual physical inspection."

In the days after the incident, the government tapped data from the intelligence community on the supply chain to instantaneously pinpoint which packages merited closer inspection.

Customs and Border Protection "adjusted the targeting rules in the Automated Targeting System to be more responsive to current threats," the officials testified. "All shipments of concern now automatically are placed on hold and are examined upon arrival. ... In recent days, we have met with key leaders in the air cargo industry and sought their assistance in identifying what data is available predeparture, which parties have the data and how early in the process the data can be provided to CBP for security screening."

Before the foiled bomb plot, procedures for examining high-risk cargo when it arrives in the United States already included a mandatory radiation scan. Also, CBP had previously partnered with some carriers to screen cargo for radioactive materials before the shipments leave a foreign airport.

The U.S. government, however, does not screen all U.S.-bound cargo in foreign countries. Current law requires only that all cargo on U.S.-bound passenger planes be screened, and DHS has yet to fulfill that mandate -- per a post--Sept. 11 law. The officials on Tuesday testified that CBP currently is coordinating with TSA to screen 100 percent of inbound cargo transported on passenger aircraft.

Threatwatch Alert

Thousands of cyber attacks occur each day

See the latest threats

JOIN THE DISCUSSION

Close [ x ] More from Nextgov
 
 

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from Nextgov.com.
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

    Download
  • Featured Content from RSA Conference: Dissed by NIST

    Learn more about the latest draft of the U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology guidance document on authentication and lifecycle management.

    Download
  • PIV- I And Multifactor Authentication: The Best Defense for Federal Government Contractors

    This white paper explores NIST SP 800-171 and why compliance is critical to federal government contractors, especially those that work with the Department of Defense, as well as how leveraging PIV-I credentialing with multifactor authentication can be used as a defense against cyberattacks

    Download
  • Toward A More Innovative Government

    This research study aims to understand how state and local leaders regard their agency’s innovation efforts and what they are doing to overcome the challenges they face in successfully implementing these efforts.

    Download
  • From Volume to Value: UK’s NHS Digital Provides U.S. Healthcare Agencies A Roadmap For Value-Based Payment Models

    The U.S. healthcare industry is rapidly moving away from traditional fee-for-service models and towards value-based purchasing that reimburses physicians for quality of care in place of frequency of care.

    Download
  • GBC Flash Poll: Is Your Agency Safe?

    Federal leaders weigh in on the state of information security

    Download

When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.