recommended reading

House, Senate agree on measure requiring standard format for spending data

House and Senate negotiators have agreed on a provision in a bill that will require federal agencies to post spending data on the Internet using uniform formats, a move that will make it easier for regulators and the public to analyze contracts and recovery funding, according to a draft reviewed by Nextgov.

The measure could gain full congressional approval before lawmakers break for the November elections, some House aides said recently.

House and Senate staff currently are reconciling differences between each chamber's versions of the 2009 Federal Financial Assistance Management Improvement Act (S. 303), which will bolster, an online gateway that allows Americans to apply for federal aid.

One compromise measure will require agencies to adhere to data standards created by the National Institute of Standards and Technology when publishing spending information such as documents associated with entitlement programs, federal contracts and loans.

The House included a similar measure in its bill, which passed in December 2009, but the legislation the Senate approved in March 2009 does not address reporting standards. The House's proposal allows agencies to pick their own standards rather than waiting for NIST to issue guidance.

The aim of the formatting rule is to boost not only consistency in spending reports, but also transparency. The most widely used format in the financial industry, eXtensible Business Reporting Language (XBRL), allows computer users to easily compare figures and check for proper accounting because its entry fields are the same in every report. Such standards now are requisite for corporate financial statements submitted to the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Rep. Darrell Issa, R-Calif., ranking member of the Oversight and Government Reform Committee, introduced the House language in May 2009 and the committee's chairman, Edolphus Towns, D-N.Y., then co-sponsored with Issa an amendment to the grant-making bill that included Issa's initial proposal.

As with the House-passed measure, the new negotiated language demands the selected standards be nonproprietary, searchable and readable by computers.

Under the discussion draft, agencies would have at least a year to comply with the requirements, which would apply to every stage of the reporting process. Departments would use the same technology for collecting, analyzing and sharing federal financial information. Content that appears on, which tracks all federal awards, and any business information that agencies make public, would have to be available in the new formats.

In the past, some federal officials have raised concerns that forcing agencies to comply with standards might stifle innovation or be too costly.

House lawmakers who finalized the financial regulatory overhaul with the Senate said they secured approval from the Obama administration for a rule that would have ensured regulators collect and publish data from financial institutions using such formats. At the last minute, senators inexplicably scrapped the idea, prompting the head of the House Financial Services Committee to commit to expediting passage of an almost identical stand-alone bill on the House floor.

Neither the House legislation nor the new proposal names specific standards, such as XBRL, so agencies are not beholden to outdated computer language if better formats become available.

Threatwatch Alert

Thousands of cyber attacks occur each day

See the latest threats


Close [ x ] More from Nextgov

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

  • Featured Content from RSA Conference: Dissed by NIST

    Learn more about the latest draft of the U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology guidance document on authentication and lifecycle management.

  • PIV- I And Multifactor Authentication: The Best Defense for Federal Government Contractors

    This white paper explores NIST SP 800-171 and why compliance is critical to federal government contractors, especially those that work with the Department of Defense, as well as how leveraging PIV-I credentialing with multifactor authentication can be used as a defense against cyberattacks

  • Toward A More Innovative Government

    This research study aims to understand how state and local leaders regard their agency’s innovation efforts and what they are doing to overcome the challenges they face in successfully implementing these efforts.

  • From Volume to Value: UK’s NHS Digital Provides U.S. Healthcare Agencies A Roadmap For Value-Based Payment Models

    The U.S. healthcare industry is rapidly moving away from traditional fee-for-service models and towards value-based purchasing that reimburses physicians for quality of care in place of frequency of care.

  • GBC Flash Poll: Is Your Agency Safe?

    Federal leaders weigh in on the state of information security


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.