recommended reading

Census Bureau meets deadline to build address file for 2010 Census

The Census Bureau has made progress on building an accurate database of addresses, but must resolve some remaining software issues and thoroughly test its systems before next years decennial count, according to the Government Accountability Office.

The Census Bureau is working to ensure its master address file, which is used to mail census forms to the nation's 140 million households, is complete and accurate, according to testimony filed by Robert Goldenkoff, director of strategic issues at GAO, with the House Subcommittee on Information Policy, Census and National Archives. But he acknowledged that despite the bureau's efforts, the recession and its impact on the housing market would make the task more difficult.

"On its face, it would appear that building an accurate address list would be a relatively straightforward task, given the obvious nature of many dwellings and the availability of postal addresses," Goldenkoff said. "Although these types of dwellings have always existed, the large number of foreclosures the nation has recently experienced, as well as the natural disasters that have hit the Gulf Coast and other regions, have likely increased the number of people doubling up, living in motels, tent cities, and other types of less conventional housing."

The address file and its digital mapping component called TIGER are considered crucial to the accuracy of the count. Shortly after the 2000 count, the bureau awarded Harris Corp. a $200 million contract to upgrade both the address file and TIGER. According to Goldenkoff, the bureau has made significant strides in updating the systems, but has not yet finalized a testing plan ahead of next year's count, jeopardizing the accuracy of the database.

"Given the importance of MAF/TIGER to establishing where to count U.S. residents, it is critical that the bureau ensure this system is thoroughly tested. Bureau officials have repeatedly stated that the limited amount of time remaining will make completing all testing activities challenging," he said in filed testimony.

Harris also was awarded a $595 million contract to develop handheld computers for census workers who go door to door to count households. In March 2008, the bureau announced it would use the handhelds only for address canvassing, which took place from March to July. About 135,000 Census employees used the devices to compare the addresses from the address file with what they saw on the ground.

According to the bureau, the exercises generally were completed ahead of schedule because of lower-than-expected employee turnover. The handheld computers experienced glitches during the first month of use, including problems with transmissions, freeze-ups and issues with the GPS function, but Goldenkoff said the bureau quickly fixed the problems using software patches.

According to the bureau's preliminary analysis, address canvassing field operations cost $444 million, 25 percent more than the initial budget of $356 million. The bureau attributed the additional cost to a greater-than-expected workload and additional staff needed to complete the exercise on time.

Threatwatch Alert

Thousands of cyber attacks occur each day

See the latest threats


Close [ x ] More from Nextgov

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • It’s Time for the Federal Government to Embrace Wireless and Mobility

    The United States has turned a corner on the adoption of mobile phones, tablets and other smart devices, outpacing traditional desktop and laptop sales by a wide margin. This issue brief discusses the state of wireless and mobility in federal government and outlines why now is the time to embrace these technologies in government.

  • Featured Content from RSA Conference: Dissed by NIST

    Learn more about the latest draft of the U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology guidance document on authentication and lifecycle management.

  • A New Security Architecture for Federal Networks

    Federal government networks are under constant attack, and the number of those attacks is increasing. This issue brief discusses today's threats and a new model for the future.

  • Going Agile:Revolutionizing Federal Digital Services Delivery

    Here’s one indication that times have changed: Harriet Tubman is going to be the next face of the twenty dollar bill. Another sign of change? The way in which the federal government arrived at that decision.

  • Software-Defined Networking

    So many demands are being placed on federal information technology networks, which must handle vast amounts of data, accommodate voice and video, and cope with a multitude of highly connected devices while keeping government information secure from cyber threats. This issue brief discusses the state of SDN in the federal government and the path forward.

  • The New IP: Moving Government Agencies Toward the Network of The Future

    Federal IT managers are looking to modernize legacy network infrastructures that are taxed by growing demands from mobile devices, video, vast amounts of data, and more. This issue brief discusses the federal government network landscape, as well as market, financial force drivers for network modernization.


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.