recommended reading

Commerce secretary questioned about census, satellites

Commerce Secretary Locke today fielded congressional anger and frustration over the major problems he inherited with the politically sensitive 2010 census, huge cost overruns on weather and environmental monitoring satellites and the chronic delays in patent application approval.

Senate Commerce-Justice-Science Appropriations Subcommittee Chairwoman Barbara Mikulski, D-Md., and ranking member Richard Shelby, R-Ala., demanded to know how he would ensure the census was completed on time, despite the failure of the hand-held computer system, and would count everyone, without political bias. Shelby was particularly concerned about reports that the census director was considering using sampling techniques to overcome any undercount and would use the liberal activist group ACORN to help collect data.

Locke assured the panel he had the resources to complete the census on time, even though it would have to be conducted by paper and pencil; had "absolutely no intention to use sampling," and would not use ACORN or any other organization to collect the census data. He expressed some confidence that the FBI would be able to screen the more than 1 million census collectors, despite its backlog in other background checks.

The subcommittee leaders were equally angry over the mishandling of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration's two satellite programs, which are expected to cost billions of dollars more than originally planned for fewer satellites. Shelby said the National Polar-Orbiting Operational Environment Satellite System was "a complete failure for NOAA and an even bigger failure for the taxpayers."

Locke acknowledged the problems and said the department has implemented many of the management improvements recommended by GAO, but admitted "much work remains to be done." Mikulski complained that the Patent and Trademark Office's record of taking years to approve patents on inventions was blocking innovation and allowing other nations to steal American inventions. "The time for talk is over. It's time for action," she said.

Threatwatch Alert

Thousands of cyber attacks occur each day

See the latest threats


Close [ x ] More from Nextgov

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

  • Featured Content from RSA Conference: Dissed by NIST

    Learn more about the latest draft of the U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology guidance document on authentication and lifecycle management.

  • PIV- I And Multifactor Authentication: The Best Defense for Federal Government Contractors

    This white paper explores NIST SP 800-171 and why compliance is critical to federal government contractors, especially those that work with the Department of Defense, as well as how leveraging PIV-I credentialing with multifactor authentication can be used as a defense against cyberattacks

  • Toward A More Innovative Government

    This research study aims to understand how state and local leaders regard their agency’s innovation efforts and what they are doing to overcome the challenges they face in successfully implementing these efforts.

  • From Volume to Value: UK’s NHS Digital Provides U.S. Healthcare Agencies A Roadmap For Value-Based Payment Models

    The U.S. healthcare industry is rapidly moving away from traditional fee-for-service models and towards value-based purchasing that reimburses physicians for quality of care in place of frequency of care.

  • GBC Flash Poll: Is Your Agency Safe?

    Federal leaders weigh in on the state of information security


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.