recommended reading

Standards for accreditation of labs that test voting machines inconsistent

The federal organizations responsible for accrediting laboratories that test voting machines aren't applying tough enough standards, according to a Government Accountability Office report released this week.

Comment on this article in The Forum.As of May 2008, four laboratories had passed muster with the National Institute of Standards and Technology and the Election Assistance Commission, created under the 2002 Help America Vote Act. But the report (GAO-08-770), released on Tuesday, called into question the validity of those assessments and noted that failure to strengthen the accreditation process could lead to inaccurate election results.

NIST, which measures laboratories' technical qualifications and then makes recommendations to EAC, was the subject of many of GAO's criticisms. Of particular concern, the watchdog agency said, was NIST's reliance on generic international standards to ensure that the people conducting the assessments were qualified. NIST should have followed requirements in the 2002 voting law, the report said.

"NIST has reported on the importance of ensuring that those … who perform accreditation assessments are sufficiently qualified and that the assessments themselves are based on explicitly defined criteria and are adequately documented," GAO stated. "Nevertheless, NIST has not fully reflected key aspects of these findings in its defined approach to accrediting voting system testing laboratories."

Until recently, NIST also failed to specify the capabilities labs must demonstrate to earn accreditation. A draft update to a program handbook EAC released in December 2007 and later approved by NIST largely fixed that problem. But questions about the validity of accreditations remain, the report said.

Furthermore, NIST either skipped or failed to document a number of self-imposed steps, according to the report. Applications and checklists used to document assessments often were inconsistent or incomplete, for example, and officials did not maintain thorough records of correspondence between assessors and the laboratories.

GAO recommended that NIST ensure assessors are qualified and trained properly, and that each laboratory review is well-documented. Similarly, GAO recommended that the EAC executive director make sure accreditation steps are documented thoroughly, requirements for the qualifications of accreditation reviewers are defined and appropriate records are maintained. The watchdog agency also suggested that EAC establish standards for determining laboratory financial stability.

"Opportunities exist for NIST and EAC to further define and implement their respective programs in ways that promote greater consistency, repeatability, and transparency -- and thus improve the results achieved," GAO reported.

Threatwatch Alert

Thousands of cyber attacks occur each day

See the latest threats


Close [ x ] More from Nextgov

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • It’s Time for the Federal Government to Embrace Wireless and Mobility

    The United States has turned a corner on the adoption of mobile phones, tablets and other smart devices, outpacing traditional desktop and laptop sales by a wide margin. This issue brief discusses the state of wireless and mobility in federal government and outlines why now is the time to embrace these technologies in government.

  • Featured Content from RSA Conference: Dissed by NIST

    Learn more about the latest draft of the U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology guidance document on authentication and lifecycle management.

  • A New Security Architecture for Federal Networks

    Federal government networks are under constant attack, and the number of those attacks is increasing. This issue brief discusses today's threats and a new model for the future.

  • Going Agile:Revolutionizing Federal Digital Services Delivery

    Here’s one indication that times have changed: Harriet Tubman is going to be the next face of the twenty dollar bill. Another sign of change? The way in which the federal government arrived at that decision.

  • Software-Defined Networking

    So many demands are being placed on federal information technology networks, which must handle vast amounts of data, accommodate voice and video, and cope with a multitude of highly connected devices while keeping government information secure from cyber threats. This issue brief discusses the state of SDN in the federal government and the path forward.

  • The New IP: Moving Government Agencies Toward the Network of The Future

    Federal IT managers are looking to modernize legacy network infrastructures that are taxed by growing demands from mobile devices, video, vast amounts of data, and more. This issue brief discusses the federal government network landscape, as well as market, financial force drivers for network modernization.


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.