recommended reading

GAO: Agencies Can’t Always Prove They Respond to Breaches


About 65 percent of the time, federal departments did not have sufficient evidence of the steps they took to respond to cyber incidents, according to federal auditors.

They often were able to show the extent of the breach, but not the severity of the impact to agency operations, Government Accountability Officials said. 

One mistake highlighted in a report GAO released on Friday: An agency learned from the Homeland Security Department that system login credentials at two divisions may have been compromised. When agency personnel responded, they "mistyped the potentially compromised credentials for one component," didn’t respond when that component asked for clarification and failed to follow up with the other component when no one there responded to an alert, Gregory Wilshusen, director for GAO information security issues, said in the audit. 

Despite these errors, personnel closed the incident without taking further action, he said. 

"Agencies did not consistently demonstrate that they responded to cyber incidents in an effective manner," Wilshusen said. "Agencies frequently documented their incident response actions for containing and eradicating incidents, but did not consistently demonstrate how they had handled incident response activities for the analysis, recovery, and post-incident phases."

Also, in about 49 percent of the incidents, agencies did not prove that they took actions to prevent a similar compromise. 

In one situation, bad actors infected an employee's laptop with malicious software to target other agency employees while the employee was travelling, the report recounts. Responders quarantined the machine but said "further actions could not be taken until the user had returned from travel," Wilshusen said. "Incident handlers did not document what, if any, action, they took when the employee returned."

The study drew its conclusions based on a sample of the 24 major agencies. Auditors indiscriminately chose a total of 240 incidents that occurred during fiscal 2012 at six randomly-picked agencies: the departments of Energy, Justice, Housing and Urban Development, Transportation, Veterans Affairs, and NASA. 

The six agencies evaluated did not run drills to test whether emergency response procedures would work during a real cyber event, auditors found.

White House and DHS officials perform "CyberStat" reviews to help bolster governmentwide cybersecurity, but their assessments do not touch on incident response, GAO officials said.

The reviews do not check whether agencies are "considering impact to aid in prioritizing incident response activities, recording key steps in responding to an incident, and documenting the costs for responding to an incident," Wilshusen said. DHS officials told GAO that their reviews discussed the closing of incidents and trends involving incident reporting. 

The new study was performed partly because of the reported intensification of cyber threats.  

Between fiscal years 2010 and 2013, agencies self-reported a more than 35 percent increase in incidents, reaching 46,160 cyber events most recently. Among the situations mentioned was someone breaking into an Energy personnel database in July and stealing banking information and password security questions from some of the 104,179 individuals affected. The saga of ex-contractor Edward Snowden's release of troves of national secrets also was cited in the report. 

After reading a draft report, Energy, DHS, NASA and VA informed GAO of specific actions they have taken or will take to address recommendations for resolving problems. Transportation told auditors the department had no comments. 

(Image via Balefire/

Threatwatch Alert

Network intrusion / Spear-phishing

Researchers: Bank-Targeting Malware Sales Rise in Dark Web Markets

See threatwatch report


Close [ x ] More from Nextgov

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

  • Featured Content from RSA Conference: Dissed by NIST

    Learn more about the latest draft of the U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology guidance document on authentication and lifecycle management.

  • PIV- I And Multifactor Authentication: The Best Defense for Federal Government Contractors

    This white paper explores NIST SP 800-171 and why compliance is critical to federal government contractors, especially those that work with the Department of Defense, as well as how leveraging PIV-I credentialing with multifactor authentication can be used as a defense against cyberattacks

  • Toward A More Innovative Government

    This research study aims to understand how state and local leaders regard their agency’s innovation efforts and what they are doing to overcome the challenges they face in successfully implementing these efforts.

  • From Volume to Value: UK’s NHS Digital Provides U.S. Healthcare Agencies A Roadmap For Value-Based Payment Models

    The U.S. healthcare industry is rapidly moving away from traditional fee-for-service models and towards value-based purchasing that reimburses physicians for quality of care in place of frequency of care.

  • GBC Flash Poll: Is Your Agency Safe?

    Federal leaders weigh in on the state of information security


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.