recommended reading

Russia’s Cyberwar Against Ukraine Is Every Bit as Strategic as its Ground Offensive

A Russian soldier marches as he and comrades block the Ukrainian infantry base in Perevalne, Ukraine, Tuesday, March 4, 2014.

A Russian soldier marches as he and comrades block the Ukrainian infantry base in Perevalne, Ukraine, Tuesday, March 4, 2014. // Darko Vojinovic/AP

The head of Ukraine’s security service says that the mobile phones of Ukrainian lawmakers are under attack by equipment located in Russian-controlled Crimea. That’s not terribly surprising, but the limited scope of the attack is.

In the past—Estonia in 2007, Georgia in 2008—Russian cyber attacks have taken the form of massive “denial of service” campaigns. This time, Russian forces are doing it the old-fashioned way, commandeering physical infrastructure. According to Ukrtelecom, some “key telecom nodes of the company in the Crimea were repeatedly blocked by unidentified uniformed people” on March 1.

The previous day, Ukrtelecom said, “unknown people seized several telecom nodes in the Crimea” and damaged its fiber backbone cable: “As a result, there are almost no services of fixed telephony, internet access, and mobile communications TriMob [Ukrtelecom mobile arm] provided in the territory of the Crimea.”

According to Telegeography, the network has 1 million mobile subscribers. Still, remote attacks on Ukraine seem to be few and far between, with only sporadic incidents in the past few weeks, according to Google’s Digital Attack Map:


Why the caution? One suggestion is that Russia maybe wary of retaliation from Ukraine, which has equally well-trained and sophisticated cyber-warriors. Moreover, only half of the six fiber links into Ukraine come from Russia, notes Richard Steinnon, a cyber-security expert. Even if Russia were to cut these off, which Steinnon thinks it will, that would achieve only limited disruption compared to the 70% it was able to control in Georgia in 2008. 

But perhaps Russia’s ambitions are more limited. Jason Rivera,  a US Army officer currently assigned to the United States Army Cyber Command, points out that the Crimea has its own internet exchange point, which is a hub for routing online traffic. “If this IXP were severely limited or shut down, which may have already happened, the Crimean Peninsula would be completely isolated, allowing Russia to control internet activity in Crimea,” he writes.

Maybe that is all that Russia wants.

Reprinted with permission from Quartz. The original story can be found here

Threatwatch Alert

Stolen credentials

Hackers Steal $31M from Russian Central Bank

See threatwatch report


Close [ x ] More from Nextgov

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

  • Featured Content from RSA Conference: Dissed by NIST

    Learn more about the latest draft of the U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology guidance document on authentication and lifecycle management.

  • PIV- I And Multifactor Authentication: The Best Defense for Federal Government Contractors

    This white paper explores NIST SP 800-171 and why compliance is critical to federal government contractors, especially those that work with the Department of Defense, as well as how leveraging PIV-I credentialing with multifactor authentication can be used as a defense against cyberattacks

  • Toward A More Innovative Government

    This research study aims to understand how state and local leaders regard their agency’s innovation efforts and what they are doing to overcome the challenges they face in successfully implementing these efforts.

  • From Volume to Value: UK’s NHS Digital Provides U.S. Healthcare Agencies A Roadmap For Value-Based Payment Models

    The U.S. healthcare industry is rapidly moving away from traditional fee-for-service models and towards value-based purchasing that reimburses physicians for quality of care in place of frequency of care.

  • GBC Flash Poll: Is Your Agency Safe?

    Federal leaders weigh in on the state of information security


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.