recommended reading

Pentagon Tries Again on Cyber Intelligence-Sharing Contract


The Defense Department will recompete a $26 million contract to support a classified cyber intelligence network, after federal attorneys determined the Pentagon failed to properly evaluate contractor proposals, Defense officials said late on Friday.

The project in question involves a network that holds "signatures" of known cyber threats identified by the National Security Agency. The system, part of a Defense Information Systems Agency program, feeds these classified and sometimes unclassified indicators of potential hacks to cleared defense companies so they can apply appropriate computer protections. 

Last fall, DISA awarded a five-year contract to the lowest-price bidder - DSA -- because none of the four information technology vendors competing offered a better value to warrant a higher pricetag, according to a Jan. 27 Government Accountability Office decision released on Friday. One of the firms, Solers, had argued that DSA's low-price did not reflect the actual labor required to do the work and contested the contract. GAO sided with Solers.

A DISA spokeswoman on Friday said the agency will amend its original solicitation and recompete the contract.

GAO attorneys had recommended DISA reevaluate proposals and obtain new submissions if necessary, or issue a clearer request for proposals and let vendors submit new proposals. 

“The agency is following GAO's recommended course of action, as such, we have amended the RFP and will be conducting evaluations of the proposals,” the DISA spokeswoman said.

The Defense Industrial Base Network, or DIBNet, job includes developing custom code and analysis of the system's security; development testing; installation; and performance evaluations, among other things.

An "agency must perform a cost realism analysis to determine the extent to which an offeror’s proposed costs are realistic for the work to be performed," GAO General Counsel Susan A. Poling said. "We conclude that the record does not demonstrate how the agency found that DSA’s proposed price/cost was realistic for the work to be performed."

In addition, Solers argued its $36 million proposal had in fact exceeded the job requirements in numerous areas. 

Poling said DISA technical evaluators agreed that the proposal was "advantageous" and exceeded the work requirements, but during litigation proceedings, the agency explained that "these areas did not merit a strength because there was no quantifiable benefit."

Where "an agency offers an explanation of its evaluation during the heat of litigation," GAO does not give much weight to that rationale, she said.

Booz Allen Hamilton, the original contractor for the DIBNet, was awarded a $4 million, six-month gap contract in January, while this dispute was going on, according to federal spending databases. 

DSA officials said they had no comment at this time. Solers officials were not immediately able to comment. 

Get the Nextgov iPhone app to keep up with government technology news.

(Image via Frontpage/

Threatwatch Alert

Network intrusion / Stolen credentials

85M User Accounts Compromised from Video-sharing Site Dailymotion

See threatwatch report


Close [ x ] More from Nextgov

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

  • Featured Content from RSA Conference: Dissed by NIST

    Learn more about the latest draft of the U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology guidance document on authentication and lifecycle management.

  • PIV- I And Multifactor Authentication: The Best Defense for Federal Government Contractors

    This white paper explores NIST SP 800-171 and why compliance is critical to federal government contractors, especially those that work with the Department of Defense, as well as how leveraging PIV-I credentialing with multifactor authentication can be used as a defense against cyberattacks

  • Toward A More Innovative Government

    This research study aims to understand how state and local leaders regard their agency’s innovation efforts and what they are doing to overcome the challenges they face in successfully implementing these efforts.

  • From Volume to Value: UK’s NHS Digital Provides U.S. Healthcare Agencies A Roadmap For Value-Based Payment Models

    The U.S. healthcare industry is rapidly moving away from traditional fee-for-service models and towards value-based purchasing that reimburses physicians for quality of care in place of frequency of care.

  • GBC Flash Poll: Is Your Agency Safe?

    Federal leaders weigh in on the state of information security


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.