recommended reading

NSA Denies Using Facebook to Hack Into Your Computer


The National Security Agency on Thursday denied using a doppelganger version of Facebook, saying it lacks the ability to do so and only conducts foreign intelligence operations that are "lawful and appropriate."

"NSA does not use its technical capabilities to impersonate U.S. company websites," the agency said in a statement. "Nor does NSA target any user of global Internet services without appropriate legal authority. Reports of indiscriminate computer exploitation operations are simply false."

The maligned federal agency was hit with a renewed wave of flogging Wednesday after a report by First Look Media said the NSA had at times "masqueraded as a fake Facebook server" in order to infect targeted computers with malware. Documents from 2009 provided by former NSA contractor Edward Snowden published in the report detailed a secret program called "Turbine" that was designed to hack into computers and gather data from foreign networks.

Nowhere in the NSA's statement, however, does it definitively state that the agency has never previously posed as another website for surveillance purposes. The agency is known for its carefully worded statements couched in qualifying language.

In response to the story, a Facebook spokesman told National Journal that the NSA could not currently spoof its site in the manner described in the First Look report because the site finished integrating secure communications protocol last year. But Facebook didn't rule out that such exploitation could have occurred in the past, when standard communications protocol was used.

The company additionally denied ever having evidence or knowledge of the spy program.

Earlier on Thursday, Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg posted a public note on his page that criticized President Obama and his administration for its surveillance programs.

(Image via antb /

Threatwatch Alert

Stolen credentials

Hackers Steal $31M from Russian Central Bank

See threatwatch report


Close [ x ] More from Nextgov

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

  • Featured Content from RSA Conference: Dissed by NIST

    Learn more about the latest draft of the U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology guidance document on authentication and lifecycle management.

  • PIV- I And Multifactor Authentication: The Best Defense for Federal Government Contractors

    This white paper explores NIST SP 800-171 and why compliance is critical to federal government contractors, especially those that work with the Department of Defense, as well as how leveraging PIV-I credentialing with multifactor authentication can be used as a defense against cyberattacks

  • Toward A More Innovative Government

    This research study aims to understand how state and local leaders regard their agency’s innovation efforts and what they are doing to overcome the challenges they face in successfully implementing these efforts.

  • From Volume to Value: UK’s NHS Digital Provides U.S. Healthcare Agencies A Roadmap For Value-Based Payment Models

    The U.S. healthcare industry is rapidly moving away from traditional fee-for-service models and towards value-based purchasing that reimburses physicians for quality of care in place of frequency of care.

  • GBC Flash Poll: Is Your Agency Safe?

    Federal leaders weigh in on the state of information security


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.