recommended reading

Accepting Credit Card Payments Involves Risk -- Even If You're the Government


Too many organizations are failing to protect customer data, as evidenced by the recent Target breach, and government offices aren't immune to the problem, according to a new report. 

Verizon, whose services include assessing payment card system security, found that 88.9 percent of its clients failed their baseline assessment. 

Although the sample size was too small to draw conclusions about public sector security, Verizon researchers said the findings speak to cardholder data protection across all organizations, not just retailers.

By doing business with cards bearing Visa or MasterCard logos and other financial brands, entities including “Army and Navy commissaries for purchasing foods” and offices handling “copay at VA hospitals” for the Veterans Affairs Department take on a risk, said Aaron Reynolds, managing principal for payment card industry consulting at Verizon.

Between 2011 and 2013, organizations that endured a cardholder data hack were typically neglecting a crucial step for spotting red flags: looking at the access logs. 

Entities suffering a breach were much less likely to monitor payment device logs, according to a comparison of Verizon’s annual data breach investigation report and the new report.

"This requirement came last in our index, suggesting that failing to manage logs effectively is a key contributor to your chances of suffering a loss of cardholder data," wrote the authors of Verizon’s 2014 report on compliance with payment card industry security standards. Security controls measured by Verizon were ranked by extent of compliance. 

"One of the main risks is that debit or credit card data continues to be on the top of the list of what hackers are targeting," Reynolds said.

Get the Nextgov iPhone app to keep up with government technology news.

(Image via Pressmaster/

Threatwatch Alert

Network intrusion / Spear-phishing

Researchers: Bank-Targeting Malware Sales Rise in Dark Web Markets

See threatwatch report


Close [ x ] More from Nextgov

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

  • Featured Content from RSA Conference: Dissed by NIST

    Learn more about the latest draft of the U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology guidance document on authentication and lifecycle management.

  • PIV- I And Multifactor Authentication: The Best Defense for Federal Government Contractors

    This white paper explores NIST SP 800-171 and why compliance is critical to federal government contractors, especially those that work with the Department of Defense, as well as how leveraging PIV-I credentialing with multifactor authentication can be used as a defense against cyberattacks

  • Toward A More Innovative Government

    This research study aims to understand how state and local leaders regard their agency’s innovation efforts and what they are doing to overcome the challenges they face in successfully implementing these efforts.

  • From Volume to Value: UK’s NHS Digital Provides U.S. Healthcare Agencies A Roadmap For Value-Based Payment Models

    The U.S. healthcare industry is rapidly moving away from traditional fee-for-service models and towards value-based purchasing that reimburses physicians for quality of care in place of frequency of care.

  • GBC Flash Poll: Is Your Agency Safe?

    Federal leaders weigh in on the state of information security


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.