recommended reading

Army Settles on Augusta for Cyber Forces Headquarters

Sgt. Nirundorn Chiv works in the virtual lab at Fort Gordon in 2010.

Sgt. Nirundorn Chiv works in the virtual lab at Fort Gordon in 2010. // Defense Department file photo

Army Cyber Command troops for the first time will be housed together under one chief, service officials said on Thursday, in announcing a collective move to Fort Gordon, Ga., home of the service's Signal Center and Signal Corps, which is responsible for electronic communications.  

Until now, the command, established in 2010, has operated out of numerous facilities and leased space in the Washington metropolitan area. The Fort Gordon consolidated location will require 150 fewer personnel and cost 23 percent less than other sites contemplated, Army officials said

The Cyber Forces will neighbor the Army's Joint Forces Headquarters-Cyber and National Security Agency-Georgia, combining Army's operational cyber headquarters with most of its cyber mission forces.  Under U.S. Cyber Command’s evolving organizational structure, each military service includes a Cyber Command component that coordinates with Command headquarters in Fort Meade near Baltimore, Md.

"Cyber threats are real, sophisticated, growing, and evolving," Lt. Gen. Edward C. Cardon, commanding general of the Army Cyber Command, said in a statement.  "The Army's decision demonstrates support for unity of command and the importance of cyber to our Army and our nation."

Officials said the siting decision was based on factors such as installation capacity, environmental impact, and human resources needs. Fort Gordon area residents had the opportunity to comment on the changes this fall, they added. 

A command liaison division will remain behind at Fort Meade, officials said.

Threatwatch Alert

Stolen credentials

Hackers Steal $31M from Russian Central Bank

See threatwatch report


Close [ x ] More from Nextgov

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

  • Featured Content from RSA Conference: Dissed by NIST

    Learn more about the latest draft of the U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology guidance document on authentication and lifecycle management.

  • PIV- I And Multifactor Authentication: The Best Defense for Federal Government Contractors

    This white paper explores NIST SP 800-171 and why compliance is critical to federal government contractors, especially those that work with the Department of Defense, as well as how leveraging PIV-I credentialing with multifactor authentication can be used as a defense against cyberattacks

  • Toward A More Innovative Government

    This research study aims to understand how state and local leaders regard their agency’s innovation efforts and what they are doing to overcome the challenges they face in successfully implementing these efforts.

  • From Volume to Value: UK’s NHS Digital Provides U.S. Healthcare Agencies A Roadmap For Value-Based Payment Models

    The U.S. healthcare industry is rapidly moving away from traditional fee-for-service models and towards value-based purchasing that reimburses physicians for quality of care in place of frequency of care.

  • GBC Flash Poll: Is Your Agency Safe?

    Federal leaders weigh in on the state of information security


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.