recommended reading

Potential Ripples of Stretched Cyber Support During Shutdown

With electronic infrastructure still up and running despite the government shutdown, the lack of staff support in information security shops is likely affecting the government’s ability to respond to cyber threats and attacks and creating potential ripple effects for cybersecurity going forward.

“What I would expect is that, by and large, just like the other services, information security is vastly undersupported, and that means that the exceptional circumstances are a problem,” said Tim Erlin, director of IT security and risk strategy at security software firm Tripwire. “When there’s an alarm or alert, the number of people available to investigate and deal with the consequences has been drastically reduced. It’s not that nobody will see the alarm; it’s that the response will be limited.”

The shutdown situation also poses threats similar to those on holidays, weekends and late nights when IT staff are operating with skeleton crews, said Lamar Bailey, Tripwire’s director of security research and development. Hostile nation states may look to exploit the shutdown as much as possible while federal agencies are distracted, he said.

“If a zero day came out today, it would be hard for government to respond,” Bailey said. “And next week, if the [shutdown] is still going on, there’s going to be a skeleton crew who can start rolling out the patches.”

There also is the ripple effect that having federal employees and contractors away from their jobs will mean that they will have a backlog of work when they return in order to return systems to a stable state. “This creates a backlog and distracts people from securing the systems,” Erlin said.

Another area of concern is that while many furloughed federal workers have shut down their desks and turned in their phones, many of them have taken their laptops home with them. “If this lasts for any amount of time and you’re not using the laptop for work, there’s a chance for the laptop to go missing,” Bailey said. “That data leakage opportunity exists as this goes longer.”

It’s also questionable whether the system to report a missing piece of hardware is considered an essential service, Erlin added. “We may find that data that’s compromised doesn’t actually surface until post-shutdown when someone actually manages to read that report that a laptop was stolen,” he said. “That’s an example of an essential service being under-supported rather than nonexistent.” 


Get the Nextgov iPhone app to keep up with government technology news.

Threatwatch Alert

Credential-stealing malware / User accounts compromised / Software vulnerability

Android Malware Infects More than 1M Phones, Adds 13,000 Devices a Day

See threatwatch report


Close [ x ] More from Nextgov

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Featured Content from RSA Conference: Dissed by NIST

    Learn more about the latest draft of the U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology guidance document on authentication and lifecycle management.

  • PIV- I And Multifactor Authentication: The Best Defense for Federal Government Contractors

    This white paper explores NIST SP 800-171 and why compliance is critical to federal government contractors, especially those that work with the Department of Defense, as well as how leveraging PIV-I credentialing with multifactor authentication can be used as a defense against cyberattacks

  • Toward A More Innovative Government

    This research study aims to understand how state and local leaders regard their agency’s innovation efforts and what they are doing to overcome the challenges they face in successfully implementing these efforts.

  • From Volume to Value: UK’s NHS Digital Provides U.S. Healthcare Agencies A Roadmap For Value-Based Payment Models

    The U.S. healthcare industry is rapidly moving away from traditional fee-for-service models and towards value-based purchasing that reimburses physicians for quality of care in place of frequency of care.

  • GBC Flash Poll: Is Your Agency Safe?

    Federal leaders weigh in on the state of information security

  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.