recommended reading

What the future of China's new Internet crackdown looks like

An Internet cafe in Peking, China

An Internet cafe in Peking, China // Andy Wong/AP

The Chinese government on Friday approved regulations that will require all of the country's Internet users to register their names, but it remains unclear when and how the ominous "real name" policy will go into effect — and what, exactly, will happen once it does. So far, the legislature has responded to a recent ramping-up in censorship with what critics call more censorship — "their intention is ... to take back that bit of space for public opinion," one told the Associated Press — and authorities maintain are policies that will "enhance protection of personal info online and safeguard public interests," according to the official state news agency. But beyond acknowledging that users will have to reveal themselves to Internet service providers, the Chinese government hasn't figured out the rest — legislation remains subject to "further deliberation and revisions." With all that uncertainty, here's what the near future of Chinese Internet freedom might look like.

Government ID for Internet Installation

How It Might Work: When the Time Warner of China comes to connect the cables, people will have to provide a government issued ID, suspects The Next Web's Josh Ong.

Censorship Factor: Medium. That scenario wouldn't have much of an effect on the average Internet user, who might have already had to do that, as China requires. The new law, however, will impact cellphone users. About 70 percent of mobile Internet users have registered with real names, according toThe New York Times's Keith Bradsher. The remaining 30 percent might not like that so much. 

Read more at The Atlantic Wire

Threatwatch Alert

Network intrusion / Spear-phishing

Researchers: Bank-Targeting Malware Sales Rise in Dark Web Markets

See threatwatch report


Close [ x ] More from Nextgov

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

  • Featured Content from RSA Conference: Dissed by NIST

    Learn more about the latest draft of the U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology guidance document on authentication and lifecycle management.

  • PIV- I And Multifactor Authentication: The Best Defense for Federal Government Contractors

    This white paper explores NIST SP 800-171 and why compliance is critical to federal government contractors, especially those that work with the Department of Defense, as well as how leveraging PIV-I credentialing with multifactor authentication can be used as a defense against cyberattacks

  • Toward A More Innovative Government

    This research study aims to understand how state and local leaders regard their agency’s innovation efforts and what they are doing to overcome the challenges they face in successfully implementing these efforts.

  • From Volume to Value: UK’s NHS Digital Provides U.S. Healthcare Agencies A Roadmap For Value-Based Payment Models

    The U.S. healthcare industry is rapidly moving away from traditional fee-for-service models and towards value-based purchasing that reimburses physicians for quality of care in place of frequency of care.

  • GBC Flash Poll: Is Your Agency Safe?

    Federal leaders weigh in on the state of information security


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.