recommended reading

BYOD security monitoring is not the norm

More than 82 percent of federal computer security professionals have policies for safeguarding government data on employees’ personal smartphones -- but most have no idea whether those policies are being followed every day, according to new research.

The findings of the survey by cybersecurity compliance firm nCircle suggest that many agencies are embracing the concept of bring-your-own-device, or BYOD, for office work. Yet they are sacrificing data protection to make that happen. While government-owned electronics use “continuous monitoring” -- or near-real-time reporting of security status through sensors and other automated tools -- the technology to track personal devices doesn’t quite exist in the government yet, the study revealed.

The protective policies that most security professionals are enforcing likely are more basic, such as training employees on proper connectivity settings and requiring personnel to notify the agency of the type of phone they are using, said Keren Cummins, nCircle's director of federal markets.

“You can have a configuration policy for what those devices are supposed to look like and you can enforce that policy by sitting down” with an employee, she said. “But that’s far short of continuously monitoring what’s on the device on a day-to-day basis.”

About 90 percent of participants who had BYOD security policies said they were enforcing them, according to the study released Thursday. Enforcement for personal devices probably involves simply spot checking security posture and other periodic oversight, Cummins said. Only 62 percent of respondents said they have a strategy for conducting continuous monitoring.

“Part of the issue is our standards have gone up,” Cummins said. Continuous monitoring became a requirement less than three years ago. “If you look at the mobile device arena, it’s very complex. You have five or six different operating systems that you need to monitor,” she added. Each brand has widely different approaches to encrypting data and verifying user identities.

To gather insights, nCircle surveyed online and interviewed more than 100 government security workers, including risk and audit managers, senior executives and contractors. The study was conducted between April and July.

Threatwatch Alert

Credential-stealing malware / User accounts compromised / Software vulnerability

Android Malware Infects More than 1M Phones, Adds 13,000 Devices a Day

See threatwatch report


Close [ x ] More from Nextgov

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Featured Content from RSA Conference: Dissed by NIST

    Learn more about the latest draft of the U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology guidance document on authentication and lifecycle management.

  • PIV- I And Multifactor Authentication: The Best Defense for Federal Government Contractors

    This white paper explores NIST SP 800-171 and why compliance is critical to federal government contractors, especially those that work with the Department of Defense, as well as how leveraging PIV-I credentialing with multifactor authentication can be used as a defense against cyberattacks

  • Toward A More Innovative Government

    This research study aims to understand how state and local leaders regard their agency’s innovation efforts and what they are doing to overcome the challenges they face in successfully implementing these efforts.

  • From Volume to Value: UK’s NHS Digital Provides U.S. Healthcare Agencies A Roadmap For Value-Based Payment Models

    The U.S. healthcare industry is rapidly moving away from traditional fee-for-service models and towards value-based purchasing that reimburses physicians for quality of care in place of frequency of care.

  • GBC Flash Poll: Is Your Agency Safe?

    Federal leaders weigh in on the state of information security

  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.