recommended reading

Ex British intel chief offers lessons in mining social media

U.K. Government Communications Headquarters is located in Cheltenham.

U.K. Government Communications Headquarters is located in Cheltenham. // Wikipedia Commons

The government needs a systematic approach to mining social media for intelligence, instead of allowing erratic practices to emerge, said Sir David Omand, former chief of the U.K. Government Communications Headquarters, a British intelligence agency. Law enforcement and security agencies that work within a framework would have more legitimacy to effectively tap social networks, he added.

His arguments, written for a U.K. audience in a paper published April 24 by a London-based think-tank, offers lessons for the U.S. government. Federal agencies such as the Intelligence Advanced Research Projects Activity and the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency are funding dozens of tools to interact with social media networks. The problem now is that the nascent technology may be advancing faster than legal frameworks being crafted to prevent abuse.

The analysis of social media can help governments study the spread of radical ideas and the intersections between criminals’ online and offline personas, the report noted. But a lack of legal and conceptual clarity around the use of data will trigger a backlash from privacy advocates. Agencies need to draw distinctions between collecting open-source, publicly accessible data and the interception of private personal information, the report notes.

So far, technology to turn large volumes of social media data into timely, decisive intelligence has fallen short, Omand said. Scotland Yard missed the opportunity to use social media to get a grasp on London’s August 2011 riots because “the surging social media output did not fit into the police’s formal process to evaluate reliability, did not therefore count as intelligence, and consequently was not acted on,” the report noted. See the full memo here.

Threatwatch Alert

Thousands of cyber attacks occur each day

See the latest threats

JOIN THE DISCUSSION

Close [ x ] More from Nextgov
 
 

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from Nextgov.com.
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Featured Content from RSA Conference: Dissed by NIST

    Learn more about the latest draft of the U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology guidance document on authentication and lifecycle management.

    Download
  • PIV- I And Multifactor Authentication: The Best Defense for Federal Government Contractors

    This white paper explores NIST SP 800-171 and why compliance is critical to federal government contractors, especially those that work with the Department of Defense, as well as how leveraging PIV-I credentialing with multifactor authentication can be used as a defense against cyberattacks

    Download
  • Toward A More Innovative Government

    This research study aims to understand how state and local leaders regard their agency’s innovation efforts and what they are doing to overcome the challenges they face in successfully implementing these efforts.

    Download
  • From Volume to Value: UK’s NHS Digital Provides U.S. Healthcare Agencies A Roadmap For Value-Based Payment Models

    The U.S. healthcare industry is rapidly moving away from traditional fee-for-service models and towards value-based purchasing that reimburses physicians for quality of care in place of frequency of care.

    Download
  • GBC Flash Poll: Is Your Agency Safe?

    Federal leaders weigh in on the state of information security

    Download
  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

    Download

When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.