recommended reading

Auditor finds security gaps in nuclear lab's information systems

The Lawrence Livermore National Nuclear Laboratory isn't adequately protecting some vital national security data and federal managers are improperly allowing contractors to make some decisions about sensitive information, according to an auditor's report released Tuesday.

In some cases, contractors have made "security-significant" changes to the computer systems that store information about the nation's nuclear weapons stockpile without the approval of the federal official in charge of those systems, according to the report from the Energy Department's inspector general.

In other cases, lab officials haven't rewritten their security protocols to reflect new minimum standards to prevent cyberattacks mandated by the Committee on National Security Systems, the report said.

The report blamed the failures on shoddy security planning and poor oversight from off-site officials at the National Nuclear Security Administration.

"Three of four system security plans we reviewed were incomplete and did not always sufficiently describe security controls and how they were implemented on the systems," the report said.

The Livermore security plans fell short on more than 25 metrics, including plans for what to do if a fire breaks out in the lab, the report said.

The auditor's report was prompted by a series of security failings at Energy Department agencies in recent years, including poor security controls at another storehouse for nuclear data, the Los Alamos National Laboratory, that led to more than 50 instances of classified data being either compromised or potentially compromised between 2002 and 2007.

The Los Alamos lab introduced new security procedures in 2006 that drastically reduced the number of security breaches.

The Livermore lab has remedied some security failings pointed out in prior IG reports, the auditors said, including ensuring that classified and nonclassified information isn't held in the same computer terminal.

The auditors recommended the National Nuclear Security Administration give clearer guidance to Livermore and other labs and develop better procedures for tracking those labs' adherence to security protocols.

Livermore managers generally agreed with the report's findings but disagreed with auditors about the scope of cybersecurity requirements that should apply to the lab, arguing the auditors were interpreting some federal security directives too broadly.

Lab management said "corrective actions were already under way," the report said, but did not include "specific corrective actions."

Threatwatch Alert

Network intrusion / Stolen credentials

85M User Accounts Compromised from Video-sharing Site Dailymotion

See threatwatch report


Close [ x ] More from Nextgov

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

  • Featured Content from RSA Conference: Dissed by NIST

    Learn more about the latest draft of the U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology guidance document on authentication and lifecycle management.

  • PIV- I And Multifactor Authentication: The Best Defense for Federal Government Contractors

    This white paper explores NIST SP 800-171 and why compliance is critical to federal government contractors, especially those that work with the Department of Defense, as well as how leveraging PIV-I credentialing with multifactor authentication can be used as a defense against cyberattacks

  • Toward A More Innovative Government

    This research study aims to understand how state and local leaders regard their agency’s innovation efforts and what they are doing to overcome the challenges they face in successfully implementing these efforts.

  • From Volume to Value: UK’s NHS Digital Provides U.S. Healthcare Agencies A Roadmap For Value-Based Payment Models

    The U.S. healthcare industry is rapidly moving away from traditional fee-for-service models and towards value-based purchasing that reimburses physicians for quality of care in place of frequency of care.

  • GBC Flash Poll: Is Your Agency Safe?

    Federal leaders weigh in on the state of information security


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.