Pentagon explores multiple paths to electronic warfare acquisition

Innovation is increasingly crucial to EW, says Assistant Secretary of Defense for Acquisition Katrina McFarland.

Shutterstock image: a global system of information relays.

The Pentagon is continuing to look for innovative ways to develop and buy technology to use in electronic warfare, the Defense Department's assistant secretary for acquisition told an AFCEA luncheon on April 10.

The Defense Department rolled out its Better Buying Power 3.0 on April 9, adding cybersecurity to the list of potential trouble spots in weapons, IT and other acquisitions. Although that new document pays special attention to ensuring cybersecurity is baked into the lifecycle of military networks and systems, Assistant Secretary of Defense for Acquisition Katrina McFarland said her department is looking at multiple ways to innovate electronic warfare technologies more efficiently.

She said her office set up an electronic warfare "shop" in the last week that will explore new ways to communicate in increasingly complex operational environments. Requests for information should be coming soon from that new effort, she said, but she provided no further details on the specifics of the operation.

Innovation is an increasingly crucial part of electronic warfare, McFarland added. The network environment has changed "logarithmically" from the radio-based networks of the 1980s and 1990s to the always-on, multi-channel networks of today. Such an increasingly complex radio-wave environment "challenges EW communications," she said. "It's changed what we do."

A more comprehensive approach to cybersecurity taken by the armed forces has begun to yield returns, she said, but more needs to be done. Better Buying Power 3.0, McFarland said, is a significant advance from Better Buying Power 1.0, which was essentially a collection of "best practices."

Better Buying Power 1.0 and 2.0 were more focused on reforming the acquisition processes and making them more efficient. The third iteration is about the larger picture of providing warfighters with a decisive technological edge even in the face of declining budgets and increasingly tech savvy foreign actors, according to McFarland.