recommended reading

Feds Sue Amazon Over Kids' Spending

A child plays on a Kindle Fire tablet.

A child plays on a Kindle Fire tablet. // Amazon/AP

Amazon should have done more to prevent kids from racking up huge bills on mobile apps, according to a federal lawsuit filed Thursday.

The Federal Trade Commission is seeking millions of dollars in refunds for parents whose children made unauthorized purchases for in-app items in Amazon's store.

For example, the app "Ice Age Village" allows users to buy additional "coins" and "acorns" using real money, the FTC said. The largest possible in-game purchase would be $99.99, according to the agency.

Some parents received bills for hundreds of dollars for their children's spending sprees, the FTC said.

Amazon keeps 30 percent of all in-app purchases, according to the complaint. The store offers apps for the Kindle Fire and other devices that use the Android operating system. 

"Amazon's in-app system allowed children to incur unlimited charges on their parents' accounts without permission," FTC Chairwoman Edith Ramirez said in a statement. "Even Amazon's own employees recognized the serious problem its process created."

The case is similar to one the FTC brought against Apple earlier this year. But Apple quickly agreed to a $32.5 million settlement and promised to change its practices to ensure that children have their parents' permission for purchases. Amazon is expected to fight the case in court.

The company sent a letter to the FTC last week, claiming that it has always refunded purchases that customers didn't want. Andrew DeVore, an Amazon associate general counsel, said that even at launch, the store included "prominent notice of in-app purchasing, effective parental controls and real-time notice of every in-app purchase."

But Jessica Rich, the director of the FTC's Bureau of Competition, told reporters on a conference call that Amazon imposed "obstacles" that prevented many consumers from getting refunds.

According to the complaint, Amazon didn't even require passwords when it first introduced in-app purchases in November 2011. The court document highlights an internal communication in which an Amazon employee said the policy was "clearly causing problems for a large percentage of our customers" and the problem was "near house on fire."

In March 2012, Amazon updated its system to require passwords for charges over $20, the FTC found. In 2013, Amazon required a password for more situations, but only in June 2014 did the company begin requiring passwords for all in-app purchases, according to the court document.

Amazon is the second company to face a major FTC lawsuit this month, following T-Mobile, which allegedly placed bogus charges on consumers' bills. 

Rich said both cases show the FTC is committed to cracking down on companies that fail to obtain "informed consent" before billing customers. 

The FTC voted 4-1 to file the lawsuit, with Republican Commissioner Joshua Wright dissenting. 

Threatwatch Alert

Thousands of cyber attacks occur each day

See the latest threats


Close [ x ] More from Nextgov

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • It’s Time for the Federal Government to Embrace Wireless and Mobility

    The United States has turned a corner on the adoption of mobile phones, tablets and other smart devices, outpacing traditional desktop and laptop sales by a wide margin. This issue brief discusses the state of wireless and mobility in federal government and outlines why now is the time to embrace these technologies in government.

  • Featured Content from RSA Conference: Dissed by NIST

    Learn more about the latest draft of the U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology guidance document on authentication and lifecycle management.

  • A New Security Architecture for Federal Networks

    Federal government networks are under constant attack, and the number of those attacks is increasing. This issue brief discusses today's threats and a new model for the future.

  • Going Agile:Revolutionizing Federal Digital Services Delivery

    Here’s one indication that times have changed: Harriet Tubman is going to be the next face of the twenty dollar bill. Another sign of change? The way in which the federal government arrived at that decision.

  • Software-Defined Networking

    So many demands are being placed on federal information technology networks, which must handle vast amounts of data, accommodate voice and video, and cope with a multitude of highly connected devices while keeping government information secure from cyber threats. This issue brief discusses the state of SDN in the federal government and the path forward.

  • The New IP: Moving Government Agencies Toward the Network of The Future

    Federal IT managers are looking to modernize legacy network infrastructures that are taxed by growing demands from mobile devices, video, vast amounts of data, and more. This issue brief discusses the federal government network landscape, as well as market, financial force drivers for network modernization.


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.