recommended reading

Marine Corps Bypasses Defense Mobile Phone Plan; Wants Commercial Options

A Marine takes a smartphone photo of military enlistees as they line up before taking their oath in front of Dallas City Hall

A Marine takes a smartphone photo of military enlistees as they line up before taking their oath in front of Dallas City Hall // LM Otero/AP File Photo

While the Defense Information Systems Agency slowly rolls out its custom-built mobile phone system that offers secure access to defense agencies and the military services, the Marine Corps is seeking a cheaper, quicker commercial alternative.

The Marines are counting on three phone companies, Verizon, AT&T and Sprint, to manage the military-grade security of the smartphones and tablets its members use. 

In a four-month experiment, the three companies have provided the Marine Corps with about two dozen Apple and Android smartphones and wireless service that includes mobile device management. Essentially it’s the commercial equivalent of the new security service DISA began offering defense agencies and the military services Jan. 31.

To protect data, the phone companies create secure partitions within smartphones where sensitive information can be sent and received, handled and stored. System administrators can set policies so that only certain activities can be conducted within the secure partition of the phone. If the device is lost or stolen, data in the partition can be deleted remotely.

The systems were developed so that companies can let their employees use their personal smartphones and tablets for work without jeopardizing the security of company information. The question the Marines want to answer is whether the commercial security systems are good enough for military purposes.

DISA’s Mobile Device Management system works much the same way, using a secure “container” within a mobile device to keep information safe, and enforcing policies that restrict what users are allowed to do. DISA also provides applications that have been deemed safe for military users.

The Marine Corps estimates that if the commercial systems prove trustworthy enough for military use, they could push the cost of security for mobile devices to as little as $60 a year.

That compares to DISA’s cost of $7.36 a month per device ($88.32 per year) for access to unclassified defense networks and $126.63 per month per device ($1,519.56 per year) for access to classified networks. DISA’s price list also notes that there is an additional 2 percent service fee.

But there are other expenses as well. For example, DISA charges $39.22 per year per user for DoD Enterprise Email. In addition, defense agencies and branches of the military have to buy their own voice and data services and their own mobile devices. 

DISA touts its Mobile Device Management system as a new way “to deliver unclassified and classified mobility capabilities to the DoD enterprise in a manner that significantly reduces cost,” but agency officials were unable to answer questions about the total cost of secure mobile services or cost comparisons between DISA’s mobile device management service and mobile security alternatives.

Lt. Col. Valerie Henderson, a spokeswoman for the Pentagon's chief information officer's office, said it is difficult to estimate potential savings for the entire Defense Department associated with DISA's mobile device plan because of differences in organizations' requirements. Nextgov requested on May 15 that the department provide information supporting its contention that the plan will save money, but she was unable to provide that information by May 21.  

Meanwhile, DISA’s mobile device management program has signed up some 2,000 users over the course of three months. Its goal was to accommodate 100,000 users by Sept. 30.

This story originally misstated why Defense officials could not make cost-savings comparisons between mobile security alternatives for the Defense Department. The difficulty relates to differences in organization's requirements, not variables in setting prices. The story has been corrected.

Threatwatch Alert

Thousands of cyber attacks occur each day

See the latest threats

JOIN THE DISCUSSION

Close [ x ] More from Nextgov
 
 

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from Nextgov.com.
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Modernizing IT for Mission Success

    Surveying Federal and Defense Leaders on Priorities and Challenges at the Tactical Edge

    Download
  • Communicating Innovation in Federal Government

    Federal Government spending on ‘obsolete technology’ continues to increase. Supporting the twin pillars of improved digital service delivery for citizens on the one hand, and the increasingly optimized and flexible working practices for federal employees on the other, are neither easy nor inexpensive tasks. This whitepaper explores how federal agencies can leverage the value of existing agency technology assets while offering IT leaders the ability to implement the kind of employee productivity, citizen service improvements and security demanded by federal oversight.

    Download
  • Effective Ransomware Response

    This whitepaper provides an overview and understanding of ransomware and how to successfully combat it.

    Download
  • Forecasting Cloud's Future

    Conversations with Federal, State, and Local Technology Leaders on Cloud-Driven Digital Transformation

    Download
  • IT Transformation Trends: Flash Storage as a Strategic IT Asset

    MIT Technology Review: Flash Storage As a Strategic IT Asset For the first time in decades, IT leaders now consider all-flash storage as a strategic IT asset. IT has become a new operating model that enables self-service with high performance, density and resiliency. It also offers the self-service agility of the public cloud combined with the security, performance, and cost-effectiveness of a private cloud. Download this MIT Technology Review paper to learn more about how all-flash storage is transforming the data center.

    Download

When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.