recommended reading

GAO blasts location-tracking privacy policies

Sen. Al Franken, D-Minn., endorsed "a fundamental right to privacy."

Sen. Al Franken, D-Minn., endorsed "a fundamental right to privacy." // J. Scott Applewhite/AP

Vague privacy policies are making it hard for consumers to protect their location and other information collected by mobile devices, according to a Government Accountability Office report released Thursday.

"Companies GAO examined disclosed in their privacy policies that the companies were collecting consumers' location data, but did not clearly state how the companies were using these data or what third parties they may share them with," GAO investigators wrote. "Furthermore, although policies stated that companies shared location data with third parties, they were sometimes vague about which types of companies these were and why they were sharing the data."

Without clear information on exactly how companies use information, consumers "would be unable to effectively judge whether the uses of their location data might violate their privacy," the report concludes.

The report urges federal action, but its only specific recommendations are that Commerce Department officials set concrete goals for their effort to work with companies and consumer advocates to develop voluntary privacy standards. It also urges the Federal Trade Commission to outline its views on mobile location-data privacy.

Lawmakers pointed to the report as evidence that legislation is needed to prevent companies from abusing location-based data.

"I believe Americans have a fundamental right to privacy: to know what information is being collected about them and to be able to control whether or not that information is shared with third parties," Sen. Al Franken, D-Minn., chairman of the Senate Judiciary Subcommittee on Privacy, Technology, and the Law, said in a statement. His Location Privacy Protection Act would require companies to ask permission before they gather or share location information.

Rep. Ed Markey, D-Mass., co-chairman of the Bipartisan Congressional Privacy Caucus, also plugged his Mobile Device Privacy Act, which would establish privacy enforcement regimes for federal regulators; and require disclosure and permission before software can be downloaded, or begin collecting or sharing location information.

"In the 21st century, a mobile phone isn't just capturing who we call and what we say, it is also transmitting where we are,' Markey said in a statement. "I welcome the GAO's recommendation of strong federal rules for mobile phone companies to help protect customers from having their locations shared with third parties without their knowledge or consent."

Threatwatch Alert

Thousands of cyber attacks occur each day

See the latest threats


Close [ x ] More from Nextgov

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Featured Content from RSA Conference: Dissed by NIST

    Learn more about the latest draft of the U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology guidance document on authentication and lifecycle management.

  • PIV- I And Multifactor Authentication: The Best Defense for Federal Government Contractors

    This white paper explores NIST SP 800-171 and why compliance is critical to federal government contractors, especially those that work with the Department of Defense, as well as how leveraging PIV-I credentialing with multifactor authentication can be used as a defense against cyberattacks

  • Toward A More Innovative Government

    This research study aims to understand how state and local leaders regard their agency’s innovation efforts and what they are doing to overcome the challenges they face in successfully implementing these efforts.

  • From Volume to Value: UK’s NHS Digital Provides U.S. Healthcare Agencies A Roadmap For Value-Based Payment Models

    The U.S. healthcare industry is rapidly moving away from traditional fee-for-service models and towards value-based purchasing that reimburses physicians for quality of care in place of frequency of care.

  • GBC Flash Poll: Is Your Agency Safe?

    Federal leaders weigh in on the state of information security

  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.