recommended reading

GSA inspector general dings e-travel system for high costs and poor design

Auditors say the General Services Administration's e-travel system still suffers from high costs and a poor design, but the agency could soon deploy a new system with improved functionality and lower costs.

In a seminannual report to Congress released on June 2, GSA's inspector general reported E2 Solutions, one of three travel management systems under the E-Gov Travel Service initiative, should better monitor costs, define performance metrics and address customer concerns about difficult and time-consuming system navigation.

The underlying audit, published this spring, isn't the first time concerns have been raised about the agency's E-Gov Travel Service. Last fall, the inspector general concluded E2 inadequately addressed security risks, and overhead costs were too high.

In February, GSA requested innovative ideas from the public to improve the travel system. The agency initially planned to offer a $25,000 prize for the best strategy but canceled the contest several days later, saying it needed to conduct more research.

The challenges with e-travel lie in addressing requirements for financial reporting to Congress, protecting individuals' personal information and government records, and filing travel reports, said Ray Bjorklund, senior vice president and chief knowledge officer for the consulting firm FedSources Inc. of McLean, Va.

GSA plans to modernize its e-travel system and in May issued a draft request for proposals for E-Gov Travel Service 2.0, which will merge trip planning, authorization, reservations, ticketing, fulfillment, expense reimbursement and travel management reporting. According to documents presented at a pre-solicitation conference for industry, the system is expected to lower costs by consolidating service providers, as well as improve data security, enhance usability and incorporate advanced technologies in green travel and mobile computing. The agency last week said a final RFP is expected in late July.

Threatwatch Alert

Network intrusion / Stolen credentials

85M User Accounts Compromised from Video-sharing Site Dailymotion

See threatwatch report


Close [ x ] More from Nextgov

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

  • Featured Content from RSA Conference: Dissed by NIST

    Learn more about the latest draft of the U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology guidance document on authentication and lifecycle management.

  • PIV- I And Multifactor Authentication: The Best Defense for Federal Government Contractors

    This white paper explores NIST SP 800-171 and why compliance is critical to federal government contractors, especially those that work with the Department of Defense, as well as how leveraging PIV-I credentialing with multifactor authentication can be used as a defense against cyberattacks

  • Toward A More Innovative Government

    This research study aims to understand how state and local leaders regard their agency’s innovation efforts and what they are doing to overcome the challenges they face in successfully implementing these efforts.

  • From Volume to Value: UK’s NHS Digital Provides U.S. Healthcare Agencies A Roadmap For Value-Based Payment Models

    The U.S. healthcare industry is rapidly moving away from traditional fee-for-service models and towards value-based purchasing that reimburses physicians for quality of care in place of frequency of care.

  • GBC Flash Poll: Is Your Agency Safe?

    Federal leaders weigh in on the state of information security


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.