recommended reading

State-Based Obamacare Exchanges Cost Far More Than the Federal Marketplace

Hawaii spent $920 to enroll each new Obamacare consumer, while Florida spent only $16.

New data from the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation details the amount spent on consumer assistance for the Affordable Care Act in each state, and like overall enrollment numbers, the state totals vary a huge amount.

Consumer-assistance programs are those intended to help individuals understand and enroll in coverage under Obamacare, including the Navigator program, the In-Person Assister program, and Certified Application Counselors. The totals do not include funding for the exchange systems or other types of public and private outreach.

Overall, the state-based marketplaces spent far more to help get residents enrolled than states in the federal marketplace. State exchanges accounted for 50 percent of total consumer-assistance funds, yet have only 31 percent of all uninsured, according to RWJF. Federal marketplaces accounted for 33 percent of the funding but house 63 percent of the uninsured, and the five partnership states received 17 percent of the assistance funding, yet include only 6 percent of the total uninsured.

State-based exchanges had far more discretion over how much of their exchange establishment grants they would allocate for consumer assistance, while funding on the federal exchange was based to a larger degree on the number of uninsured residents. Thus state-based exchanges had a much larger range in assistance funding: While spending in federal-marketplace states ranged from $16 per enrollee in Florida to $186 per enrollee in Alaska, spending in state-based exchanges was across the board, from $40 in Idaho to $920 in Hawaii.

Top Five Spenders per Enrollee:

1. Hawaii: $920 per enrollee, $7,904,918 total (state-based exchange)

2. District of Columbia: $645 per enrollee; $6,906,057 total (state-based exchange)

3. Arkansas: $442 per enrollee; $19,211,296 total (partnership exchange)

4. West Virginia: $385 per enrollee; $7,647,178 total (partnership exchange)

5. Maryland: $385 per enrollee; $25,620,449 total (state-based exchange)

Bottom Five Spenders per Enrollee:

1. Florida: $16 per enrollee; $15,932,367 total (federal exchange)

2. Wisconsin: $20 per enrollee; $2,772,728 total (federal exchange)

3. Virginia: $20 per enrollee; $4,263,053 total (federal exchange)

4. Pennsylvania: $22 per enrollee; $6,905,518 total (federal exchange)

5. Georgia: $23 per enrollee; $7,194,944 total (federal exchange)

The state that spent most on consumer assistance was California, at $61,631,657 total. But California also enrolled the most people in coverage by far, with 1,405,102 Californians signed up for coverage through Covered California, the state exchange. Wyoming—part of the federal exchange—spent the least on consumer assistance, at $914,232, and enrolled 11,970 residents, the fourth-lowest number of all states.

The 25 lowest spenders per enrollee included only three state-based exchanges: Idaho, California, and Connecticut. The top half of big spenders included only six states in the federal exchange: Alaska, South Dakota, North Dakota, Wyoming, Montana, and Mississippi.

"The availability of federal money and the type of marketplace were huge factors in the amount states spent to enroll the uninsured," said Katherine Hempstead, who leads coverage issues at the RWJF. "The real question, which can only be answered in time, is how big of a role states' consumer assistance programs played in overall enrollment success."

A number of other factors are at play as well, including functionality of the exchange system, the degree to which the state has embraced the health care law, and involvement of other enrollment outreach groups, whose funding is not included in these tallies.

Threatwatch Alert

Thousands of cyber attacks occur each day

See the latest threats


Close [ x ] More from Nextgov

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Modernizing IT for Mission Success

    Surveying Federal and Defense Leaders on Priorities and Challenges at the Tactical Edge

  • Communicating Innovation in Federal Government

    Federal Government spending on ‘obsolete technology’ continues to increase. Supporting the twin pillars of improved digital service delivery for citizens on the one hand, and the increasingly optimized and flexible working practices for federal employees on the other, are neither easy nor inexpensive tasks. This whitepaper explores how federal agencies can leverage the value of existing agency technology assets while offering IT leaders the ability to implement the kind of employee productivity, citizen service improvements and security demanded by federal oversight.

  • Effective Ransomware Response

    This whitepaper provides an overview and understanding of ransomware and how to successfully combat it.

  • Forecasting Cloud's Future

    Conversations with Federal, State, and Local Technology Leaders on Cloud-Driven Digital Transformation

  • IT Transformation Trends: Flash Storage as a Strategic IT Asset

    MIT Technology Review: Flash Storage As a Strategic IT Asset For the first time in decades, IT leaders now consider all-flash storage as a strategic IT asset. IT has become a new operating model that enables self-service with high performance, density and resiliency. It also offers the self-service agility of the public cloud combined with the security, performance, and cost-effectiveness of a private cloud. Download this MIT Technology Review paper to learn more about how all-flash storage is transforming the data center.


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.