recommended reading

After 6 Years, VA Has Added Just One Name to Eye Injury Database

Travis Fugate, a member of the Kentucky National Guard who was blinded by an IED attack in Iraq, wipes his eyes as he testifies on before Congress on May 29, 2014.

Travis Fugate, a member of the Kentucky National Guard who was blinded by an IED attack in Iraq, wipes his eyes as he testifies on before Congress on May 29, 2014. // J. Scott Applewhite/AP

The Veterans Affairs Department has added only one name to an eye injury registry established by Congress in January 2008, senior VA officials told flabbergasted members of the House Veterans Affairs Committee panel on oversight and investigations today.

The department also is not in full compliance with standards established in 2000 to ensure that blind veterans can access its websites, officials said.

The VA will let a contract for its portion of the Defense and Veterans Eye Injury and Vision Registry this summer, which is expected to be fully operational by October 2015, according to Dr. Maureen McCarthy, deputy chief of the Patient Care Services Office in the Veterans Health Administration.

Though the Defense Department has populated the vision database with 23,663 patients, VA has added only one, to test the system, McCarthy testified. In her written testimony, McCarthy explained that the department needs to hire a contractor to manually extract clinical data from VA’s electronic medical records and its compensation and pension records into a computable database, the VA Eye Injury Data Store.

Information from the data store will then be electronically transferred to the joint eye registry, where it will be used in analyses of veteran eye injuries.

McCarthy told lawmakers that VA received $6.9 million in funds for its portion of the joint registry to cover costs from 2010-2014, with $4.1 million allocated for salaries and $2.8 million for the data extraction contract.

Rep. Dan Benishek, R-Mich., said “I can’t believe it has taken five years to get this going,” and pointed out that it has taken VA longer to develop its portion of the eye registry than the duration of World War II.

Terry Kebbel, a blind Vietnam Veteran from Las Cruces, N.M., said VA’s lack of compliance with an amendment to the 1973 Rehabilitation Act that established accessibility standards for federal websites, has been frustrating.

Kebbel uses a screen reader to translate Web text into audio, but told lawmakers that the structure of VA Web pages, which lack headers, makes that difficult. VA also attaches forms as image files to Web pages, which his reader cannot process, meaning he cannot fill them out, Kebbel said.

Subcommittee chairman Mike Coffman, R-Colo., pressed VA witnesses to say when all their websites would meet accessibility standards set in 2000. Lorraine Landfried, VA deputy chief information officer for product development, said it was difficult to ensure 100 percent access by the blind to VA Web sites because the department is in a constant process of updating its websites and software.

Threatwatch Alert

Thousands of cyber attacks occur each day

See the latest threats


Close [ x ] More from Nextgov

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • It’s Time for the Federal Government to Embrace Wireless and Mobility

    The United States has turned a corner on the adoption of mobile phones, tablets and other smart devices, outpacing traditional desktop and laptop sales by a wide margin. This issue brief discusses the state of wireless and mobility in federal government and outlines why now is the time to embrace these technologies in government.

  • Featured Content from RSA Conference: Dissed by NIST

    Learn more about the latest draft of the U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology guidance document on authentication and lifecycle management.

  • A New Security Architecture for Federal Networks

    Federal government networks are under constant attack, and the number of those attacks is increasing. This issue brief discusses today's threats and a new model for the future.

  • Going Agile:Revolutionizing Federal Digital Services Delivery

    Here’s one indication that times have changed: Harriet Tubman is going to be the next face of the twenty dollar bill. Another sign of change? The way in which the federal government arrived at that decision.

  • Software-Defined Networking

    So many demands are being placed on federal information technology networks, which must handle vast amounts of data, accommodate voice and video, and cope with a multitude of highly connected devices while keeping government information secure from cyber threats. This issue brief discusses the state of SDN in the federal government and the path forward.

  • The New IP: Moving Government Agencies Toward the Network of The Future

    Federal IT managers are looking to modernize legacy network infrastructures that are taxed by growing demands from mobile devices, video, vast amounts of data, and more. This issue brief discusses the federal government network landscape, as well as market, financial force drivers for network modernization.


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.