recommended reading

More Early Warning Signs of Obamacare Site Issues

Jim Vallee/

Another document released by House investigators shows early warning signs of's readiness in jeopardy.

A McKinsey & Co. report from late March said that progress on the Obamacare enrollment website was falling behind and at risk of failure unless immediate actions were taken, The New York Times reports.

The report, released by the House Energy and Commerce Committee, found that the site was at risk due to several issues, including "significant dependency on external parties/contractors," "insufficient time and scope of end-to-end testing," and "parallel stacking of all phases." 

These concerns have all turned out to be accurate, as officials rush to repair the troubled website ahead of the Nov. 30 target date. The administration says it aims to have the site "operating smoothly for the vast majority of users" by that time, which The Washington Post recently revealed means able to enroll 80 percent. One individual told The Times a more realistic goal may be that four out of five have "a positive experience."

The McKinsey report was released as positive signs for progress on were being reported. According to individuals working on the project, more than 50,000 people had chosen an insurance plan as of mid-November, up from 27,000 for all of October.

However, the security of the website remains a concern on both sides. House Republicans have repeatedly cited a report by MITRE—one of the main companies hired to assess the site's security—which said on Oct. 11 that it was "unable to adequately test the confidentiality and integrity" of the exchange, and that full end-to-end testing never occurred.

White House officials and some computer experts maintain that the site is secure and that much of the criticism is overstated. 

A House Energy and Commerce Committee hearing today on the security of will include testimony from MITRE Senior Vice President and General Manager Jason Providakes, and CMS Deputy Chief Information Officer Henry Chao.

(Image via Jim Vallee/

Threatwatch Alert

Thousands of cyber attacks occur each day

See the latest threats


Close [ x ] More from Nextgov

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Featured Content from RSA Conference: Dissed by NIST

    Learn more about the latest draft of the U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology guidance document on authentication and lifecycle management.

  • PIV- I And Multifactor Authentication: The Best Defense for Federal Government Contractors

    This white paper explores NIST SP 800-171 and why compliance is critical to federal government contractors, especially those that work with the Department of Defense, as well as how leveraging PIV-I credentialing with multifactor authentication can be used as a defense against cyberattacks

  • Toward A More Innovative Government

    This research study aims to understand how state and local leaders regard their agency’s innovation efforts and what they are doing to overcome the challenges they face in successfully implementing these efforts.

  • From Volume to Value: UK’s NHS Digital Provides U.S. Healthcare Agencies A Roadmap For Value-Based Payment Models

    The U.S. healthcare industry is rapidly moving away from traditional fee-for-service models and towards value-based purchasing that reimburses physicians for quality of care in place of frequency of care.

  • GBC Flash Poll: Is Your Agency Safe?

    Federal leaders weigh in on the state of information security

  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.