recommended reading

Did Sebelius Have the Authority to Delay Obamacare Website Launch?

Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius

Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius // Evan Vucci/AP

Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Administrator Marilyn Tavenner said Tuesday that she did not know whether Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius had the authority to delay the Oct. 1 launch of

The CMS official testified before the Senate Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions committee on the rocky rollout of the Obamacare enrollment website.  

Tavenner's statement came as Sen. Richard Burr, R-N.C., questioned her on the decision to go ahead with the scheduled launch date despite indications that there were security issues with the site.

Burr brought up a CMS memo dated Sept. 27 that said insufficient testing "exposed a level of uncertainty that can be deemed as a high risk," just a few days before the site went live. The memo—signed by Tavenner—granted authority to proceed with the website launch.

"I think in this case, because of the visibility of the exchange, the chief information officer wanted to make me aware of it, and I agreed to sign it, with their recommendation to proceed," Tavenner said, explaining that no one else, including Sebelius, reviewed that decision.

"My expectation was that the site would work, but have the customary glitches of any new site," she said of launch.

Lawmakers have tried to get to the bottom of what exactly was known about the extent of the website's problems prior to Oct. 1, and who made the ultimate decision to go ahead with the scheduled launch date despite indications of trouble.

HHS did not immediately respond to a request for comment on whether Sebelius had that authority.

Here today's exchange:

Burr: "Secretary Sebelius said last week that the implementation took place on Oct. 1 because that was the law. Now let me ask you: I've read the act several times. My interpretation is that Secretary Sebelius had the authority not to execute that on Oct. 1—and clearly my interpretation—if you had not signed the authority to operate the website, it would not have stood up on Oct. 1. Are my two statements accurate?"

Tavenner: "I don't know that your statements are accurate. The law says that Jan. 1 is when individuals have to have coverage. We put a regulation in place that said Oct. 1 would be the day we would start, so that people would have time to sign up. We did—we declared the six-month enrollment window."

Burr: "Do you think that the secretary had the authority to waive the Oct. 1 regulation?"

Tavenner: "I do not know the answer to that question."

Threatwatch Alert

Thousands of cyber attacks occur each day

See the latest threats


Close [ x ] More from Nextgov

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • It’s Time for the Federal Government to Embrace Wireless and Mobility

    The United States has turned a corner on the adoption of mobile phones, tablets and other smart devices, outpacing traditional desktop and laptop sales by a wide margin. This issue brief discusses the state of wireless and mobility in federal government and outlines why now is the time to embrace these technologies in government.

  • Featured Content from RSA Conference: Dissed by NIST

    Learn more about the latest draft of the U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology guidance document on authentication and lifecycle management.

  • A New Security Architecture for Federal Networks

    Federal government networks are under constant attack, and the number of those attacks is increasing. This issue brief discusses today's threats and a new model for the future.

  • Going Agile:Revolutionizing Federal Digital Services Delivery

    Here’s one indication that times have changed: Harriet Tubman is going to be the next face of the twenty dollar bill. Another sign of change? The way in which the federal government arrived at that decision.

  • Software-Defined Networking

    So many demands are being placed on federal information technology networks, which must handle vast amounts of data, accommodate voice and video, and cope with a multitude of highly connected devices while keeping government information secure from cyber threats. This issue brief discusses the state of SDN in the federal government and the path forward.

  • The New IP: Moving Government Agencies Toward the Network of The Future

    Federal IT managers are looking to modernize legacy network infrastructures that are taxed by growing demands from mobile devices, video, vast amounts of data, and more. This issue brief discusses the federal government network landscape, as well as market, financial force drivers for network modernization.


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.