recommended reading

Alaska native firm played role in failed medical review board software project

Sen. Claire McCaskill, D-Mo.

Sen. Claire McCaskill, D-Mo. // Charlie Riedel/AP

Work on a botched program to develop software for the Defense Medical Examination Review Board was performed by an Alaska native company, said Steven Davis, a spokesman for the Space and Naval Warfare Systems Command. The command’s Atlantic center contracted with software engineering firm Barling Bay LLC to support development of a medical records system that has come under fire for failing so severely that responsibility for the work was transferred to the General Services Administration.

Barling Bay is a subsidiary of Three Saints LLC, a holding company headquartered in Anchorage. Under federal law, Alaska native firms receive preferential treatment in government contracts.

Sen. Claire McCaskill, D-Mo., chairwoman of the contracting oversight panel for the Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee, charged in a Dec. 7 letter to Chief of Naval Operations Adm. Jonathan Greenert that SPAWAR’s management of the contract for service academy exams was “so inadequate that the General Services Administration had to assume responsibility.” The review board determines the medical qualification of more than 50,000 applicants annually for appointment to a U.S. service academy, the Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences and the Reserve Officer Training Corps.

McCaskill also told Greenert that software development is “now behind schedule and more than $7 million over budget because SPAWAR underestimated the project’s cost.” A Defense source told Nextgov, “the anticipated delivery date is unknown, but it certainly won’t be delivered until late 2013, if at all.”

Davis did not define the scope of Barling Bay’s responsibilities on the contract.

The 1971 Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act gives Alaska native corporations special contracting advantages aimed at benefitting disadvantaged and economically depressed communities, but critics say the program has lined the pockets of non-natives and done little to aid those it was designed to help, Government Executive Magazine has reported in articles dating to 2005.

Barling Bay, which has corporate offices in Charleston, S.C., seven miles from SPAWAR, was the fastest growing company in the state in 2011, according to a press release on the Three Saints website.

Established in 2002, Barling Bay had revenues of slightly less than $30 million in 2010, according to a company presentation that described work on health care systems projects for the Military Health System, the Veterans Affairs Department and the Navy Bureau of Medicine.

VA told Nextgov last week that it has an agreement with SPAWAR for the command to work on a number of information technology projects, including development of the integrated electronic health record with the Defense Department.

McCaskill has scrutinized Alaska native corporation contracts for years, and in 2010 introduced a bill to curb their contracting preferences and followed up with similar legislation in 2011.

Barling Bay and Three Saints did not return calls for comment. Davis said SPAWAR is working to successfully complete the review board project, but provided no time line.

Threatwatch Alert

Thousands of cyber attacks occur each day

See the latest threats


Close [ x ] More from Nextgov

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • It’s Time for the Federal Government to Embrace Wireless and Mobility

    The United States has turned a corner on the adoption of mobile phones, tablets and other smart devices, outpacing traditional desktop and laptop sales by a wide margin. This issue brief discusses the state of wireless and mobility in federal government and outlines why now is the time to embrace these technologies in government.

  • Featured Content from RSA Conference: Dissed by NIST

    Learn more about the latest draft of the U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology guidance document on authentication and lifecycle management.

  • A New Security Architecture for Federal Networks

    Federal government networks are under constant attack, and the number of those attacks is increasing. This issue brief discusses today's threats and a new model for the future.

  • Going Agile:Revolutionizing Federal Digital Services Delivery

    Here’s one indication that times have changed: Harriet Tubman is going to be the next face of the twenty dollar bill. Another sign of change? The way in which the federal government arrived at that decision.

  • Software-Defined Networking

    So many demands are being placed on federal information technology networks, which must handle vast amounts of data, accommodate voice and video, and cope with a multitude of highly connected devices while keeping government information secure from cyber threats. This issue brief discusses the state of SDN in the federal government and the path forward.

  • The New IP: Moving Government Agencies Toward the Network of The Future

    Federal IT managers are looking to modernize legacy network infrastructures that are taxed by growing demands from mobile devices, video, vast amounts of data, and more. This issue brief discusses the federal government network landscape, as well as market, financial force drivers for network modernization.


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.