recommended reading

Jailed man narrowly escapes fatal error in electronic health record


In one of a series of alleged errors by a county jail’s new electronic health record system, the EHR recommended what could have been a fatal dose of medication for a heart patient, the jail’s nurses said this week.

A nurse in the Contra Costa jail who is familiar with the patient noticed the discrepancy and administered the proper dosage, the Contra Costa Times reported Tuesday. The new $45 million EHR, which integrates jail medical records with other county health records, drew 142 complaints from nurses during its first month in operation, a nursing union representative told county commissioners.

"I have never in all the time working with the California Nursing Association seen that many (complaints) be filled out," the union representative, Jerry Fillingim, told the newspaper. "Each day these nurses are fearful that they will kill somebody . . . I think the county tried to rush it, making it comprehensive for everything."

Lee Ann Fagan, the registered nurse who says she caught the drug discrepancy, called the EHR “dangerous” in an interview with the newspaper. "It's hard to work in an environment that's so frustrating. What nurses want is for the [electronic health record system] to go away until it's fixed," she said.

Fagan said super-users responsible for training other staff on the EHR had warned county health leaders of problems with the system. Four hours of training before the electronic system went live were “next to useless because the program wasn’t in place well enough to practice,” she told the newspaper.

She and Fillingim said the problems have been most severe in the jail.

In a commentary that appeared in the newsletter EHR Intelligence, writer Kyle Murphy says the Contra Costa jail problems raise a red flag and potentially damages the vendor’s ability to regain user trust. But he also questioned whether human error played a role, noting that the EHR had only been in use for a month and that users had received only two, two-hour training sessions.

(Image via 18percentgrey/

Threatwatch Alert

Thousands of cyber attacks occur each day

See the latest threats


Close [ x ] More from Nextgov

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

  • Featured Content from RSA Conference: Dissed by NIST

    Learn more about the latest draft of the U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology guidance document on authentication and lifecycle management.

  • PIV- I And Multifactor Authentication: The Best Defense for Federal Government Contractors

    This white paper explores NIST SP 800-171 and why compliance is critical to federal government contractors, especially those that work with the Department of Defense, as well as how leveraging PIV-I credentialing with multifactor authentication can be used as a defense against cyberattacks

  • Toward A More Innovative Government

    This research study aims to understand how state and local leaders regard their agency’s innovation efforts and what they are doing to overcome the challenges they face in successfully implementing these efforts.

  • From Volume to Value: UK’s NHS Digital Provides U.S. Healthcare Agencies A Roadmap For Value-Based Payment Models

    The U.S. healthcare industry is rapidly moving away from traditional fee-for-service models and towards value-based purchasing that reimburses physicians for quality of care in place of frequency of care.

  • GBC Flash Poll: Is Your Agency Safe?

    Federal leaders weigh in on the state of information security


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.