recommended reading

Procurement office recommends new cadre of IT experts

The Office of Federal Procurement Policy has instructed agency acquisition chiefs to consider forming specialized teams whose members have deep subject matter knowledge to manage information technology purchases.

The plan, outlined in a July 13 memo from OFPP Administrator Dan Gordon, generally jibes with a revised acquisition process described in federal Chief Information Officer Vivek Kundra's overall IT reform plan, released in December 2010.

That plan bemoaned the fact that government contracting officers often are experts in ethics and protocol but have limited in-depth knowledge about the industries they're working with or the government customers they're purchasing for. That deficiency can be especially costly with major IT purchases because much of the work is deeply technical and innovations may cause an agency to change its requirements several times during a lengthy acquisition cycle.

Kundra's plan envisioned standing up a cadre of IT acquisition expert teams governmentwide to facilitate major purchases and help break down some bureaucratic walls between contracting officers, agency customers and vendors. The plan called for experts at larger agencies to pitch in at smaller agencies that make fewer big IT purchases and where an expert team isn't feasible.

Some IT-heavy agencies already have created such expert teams, according to the plan, including NASA and the National Institutes of Health.

Gordon's July memo doesn't mandate that agencies create an IT acquisition cadre, but it does require them to supplement their most recent acquisition human capital plan, a master document of federal contracting, with a description of whether an IT expert team is appropriate and how the agency will go about creating one if it is.

Those supplements are due by the end of August, the memo said.

IT acquisition teams should include program managers and contracting officers, the memo said, and possibly other employees specifically responsible for maintaining the lines of communication between the acquisitions group and its agency customers.

Agencies should strongly consider forming IT acquisition cadres if they make major and diverse technology purchases, the memo said, or if watchdog reports have pointed out weaknesses in their IT procurements.

Threatwatch Alert

Thousands of cyber attacks occur each day

See the latest threats


Close [ x ] More from Nextgov

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

  • Featured Content from RSA Conference: Dissed by NIST

    Learn more about the latest draft of the U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology guidance document on authentication and lifecycle management.

  • PIV- I And Multifactor Authentication: The Best Defense for Federal Government Contractors

    This white paper explores NIST SP 800-171 and why compliance is critical to federal government contractors, especially those that work with the Department of Defense, as well as how leveraging PIV-I credentialing with multifactor authentication can be used as a defense against cyberattacks

  • Toward A More Innovative Government

    This research study aims to understand how state and local leaders regard their agency’s innovation efforts and what they are doing to overcome the challenges they face in successfully implementing these efforts.

  • From Volume to Value: UK’s NHS Digital Provides U.S. Healthcare Agencies A Roadmap For Value-Based Payment Models

    The U.S. healthcare industry is rapidly moving away from traditional fee-for-service models and towards value-based purchasing that reimburses physicians for quality of care in place of frequency of care.

  • GBC Flash Poll: Is Your Agency Safe?

    Federal leaders weigh in on the state of information security


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.