recommended reading

White House drops first names from We the People petitions

Lisa S./

The White House has abbreviated citizen signatures on its We the People petition website.The signatures, which used to include a signer’s first name and last initial, now just include first and last initials.

The signature blocks also include the signer’s location and the date of the signature. 

The change comes less than two weeks after the White House raised the bar for petitions to receive an official response to 100,000 signatures in one month. The 16-month-old website was flooded with hundreds of thousands of petitions related to the shooting of 26 people at an elementary school in Newtown, Conn., in December and from citizens seeking to secede from the union after President Obama’s reelection in November.

The change affected both signatures on active petitions and on historic petitions that have already received a White House response.

There was no public announcement of the change and the White House declined to comment about it on the record.

The change will likely reduce the amount of monitoring and oversight White House staffers must perform on petitions. There’s no mechanism to ensure people who register with We the People are using their real names, so it would be possible for registrants, for instance, to enter profanity in the first name field.

The move will also inhibit some social science research using the site, such as a University of North Carolina study that divided signers of secession petitions by their presumed gender.  

The White House has stated in the past that it retains all data it removes from the public We the People site in order to comply with the Federal Records Act. Previously, the White House has only removed petitions that failed to meet the threshold for an administration response and petitions that violated the site’s terms of service

(Image via Lisa S./

Threatwatch Alert

Thousands of cyber attacks occur each day

See the latest threats


Close [ x ] More from Nextgov

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

  • Featured Content from RSA Conference: Dissed by NIST

    Learn more about the latest draft of the U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology guidance document on authentication and lifecycle management.

  • PIV- I And Multifactor Authentication: The Best Defense for Federal Government Contractors

    This white paper explores NIST SP 800-171 and why compliance is critical to federal government contractors, especially those that work with the Department of Defense, as well as how leveraging PIV-I credentialing with multifactor authentication can be used as a defense against cyberattacks

  • Toward A More Innovative Government

    This research study aims to understand how state and local leaders regard their agency’s innovation efforts and what they are doing to overcome the challenges they face in successfully implementing these efforts.

  • From Volume to Value: UK’s NHS Digital Provides U.S. Healthcare Agencies A Roadmap For Value-Based Payment Models

    The U.S. healthcare industry is rapidly moving away from traditional fee-for-service models and towards value-based purchasing that reimburses physicians for quality of care in place of frequency of care.

  • GBC Flash Poll: Is Your Agency Safe?

    Federal leaders weigh in on the state of information security


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.