recommended reading

NTSB’s cursory exam of the Boeing 787’s main battery shows no problems

Elaine Thompson/AP

The National Transportation Safety Board said a “cursory comparative exam” found no obvious anomalies in the main lithium ion battery of the Japan Airlines Boeing 787 that caught fire on Jan. 7 at Logan International Airport in Boston.

After an All Nippon Airlines 787 battery started smoking while in flight on Jan. 16, regulators around the world, including the FAA, grounded all 50 aircraft in operation until Boeing fixes the battery problems.

Last Thursday, the NTSB reported that the lithium ion batteries in the JAL aircraft’s auxillary power unit experienced short circuits and a “thermal runaway” -- a rapid, uncontrolled increase in temperature. The NTSB, in a press release Sunday, said “more detailed examination will be conducted as the main battery undergoes a thorough tear down and test sequence series of non-destructive examinations.”

The main 787 battery is housed in a compartment under the cockpit; the APU battery is located in another compartment just aft of the wings, as shown in this schematic drawing. GS Yuasa of Kyoto manufactures the 787 batteries.

The NTSB said it conducted a test of an APU at manufacturer Securaplane’s lab in Tucson, Ariz., and the APU controller at UTC Aerospace Systems in Phoenix. “Both units operated normally with no significant findings,” the board said. UTC is a subsidiary of United Technologies and Securaplane is a subsidiary of U.K.-based Meggit PLC. Thales PLC, located in a Paris suburb, has a contract for the 787’s electrical power conversion system.

Two NTSB investigators have been dispatched to Seattle, with one assisting the FAA in its testing of Boeing’s 787 “root cause corrective efforts” and the other will take part on the FAA review of battery system special compliance documentation. In November 2007, FAA granted Boeing permission to operate the 787 under “special conditions,” which acknowledged the known flammability of lithium ion batteries

Threatwatch Alert

Thousands of cyber attacks occur each day

See the latest threats


Close [ x ] More from Nextgov

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

  • Featured Content from RSA Conference: Dissed by NIST

    Learn more about the latest draft of the U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology guidance document on authentication and lifecycle management.

  • PIV- I And Multifactor Authentication: The Best Defense for Federal Government Contractors

    This white paper explores NIST SP 800-171 and why compliance is critical to federal government contractors, especially those that work with the Department of Defense, as well as how leveraging PIV-I credentialing with multifactor authentication can be used as a defense against cyberattacks

  • Toward A More Innovative Government

    This research study aims to understand how state and local leaders regard their agency’s innovation efforts and what they are doing to overcome the challenges they face in successfully implementing these efforts.

  • From Volume to Value: UK’s NHS Digital Provides U.S. Healthcare Agencies A Roadmap For Value-Based Payment Models

    The U.S. healthcare industry is rapidly moving away from traditional fee-for-service models and towards value-based purchasing that reimburses physicians for quality of care in place of frequency of care.

  • GBC Flash Poll: Is Your Agency Safe?

    Federal leaders weigh in on the state of information security


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.