recommended reading

Why pilots can use iPads and you can't

Flickr user Fly For Fun

Just as all hope was lost for flyers in the crusade to use gadgets during take-off and landing, American Airlines pilots just got the Federal Aviation Association go-ahead to use iPads during all phases of flight. It seems unfair to passengers packing iPads, doesn't it? The people steering the ship get to do the exact thing we can't. That's how our commenter Seth Levi felt after reading about the double standard yesterday. "What's really insane is that pilots are now using iPads as flight manuals. So using an iPad *in the cockpit* doesn't screw up the computers inches away from it, but some how my iPad 100ft away will?" he said. And that was before this approval for iPads during takeoff and landing. But, the rules for people operating the planes are different than the ones for you and me. Here's why.

  • Safety. That was the F.A.A's official stance on the issue last year, when it mentioned a pilot program for the plane operators. We've reached out to them for a more current comment, but as of the writing of this they had yet to get back to us. Back then, they said that when it comes to "potential interference" two iPads up front was a lot different than "unlimited passenger use, which could involve dozens or even hundreds of devices at the same time," a spokesperson told The New York Times's resident iPad during takeoff crusader Nick Bilton. Though, this answer does not satisfy Bilton this time around: "So first it’s no iPads because of potential interference. Then two iPads are O.K. — but only two. Now we will have five or six iPads on airplanes?" he wrote.  

Read more at The Atlantic Wire.

Threatwatch Alert

Thousands of cyber attacks occur each day

See the latest threats


Close [ x ] More from Nextgov

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

  • Featured Content from RSA Conference: Dissed by NIST

    Learn more about the latest draft of the U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology guidance document on authentication and lifecycle management.

  • PIV- I And Multifactor Authentication: The Best Defense for Federal Government Contractors

    This white paper explores NIST SP 800-171 and why compliance is critical to federal government contractors, especially those that work with the Department of Defense, as well as how leveraging PIV-I credentialing with multifactor authentication can be used as a defense against cyberattacks

  • Toward A More Innovative Government

    This research study aims to understand how state and local leaders regard their agency’s innovation efforts and what they are doing to overcome the challenges they face in successfully implementing these efforts.

  • From Volume to Value: UK’s NHS Digital Provides U.S. Healthcare Agencies A Roadmap For Value-Based Payment Models

    The U.S. healthcare industry is rapidly moving away from traditional fee-for-service models and towards value-based purchasing that reimburses physicians for quality of care in place of frequency of care.

  • GBC Flash Poll: Is Your Agency Safe?

    Federal leaders weigh in on the state of information security


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.