recommended reading

Technology could identify soldiers intent on suicide or murder

Army Maj. Nidal Hasan killed 13 people and injured 43 others in 2009.

Army Maj. Nidal Hasan killed 13 people and injured 43 others in 2009. // AP file photo

The Pentagon’s research wing is seeking technology that can determine whether a soldier is prone to commit suicide or murder.

The Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency is looking to fund the development of “mathematical and computational models that predict whether a person is likely to commit suicide,” contract databases reveal. The goal is to extend prototypes to “predict other neurocognitive states of extreme order, including homicidal intent.”

The program, called Predicting Suicide Intent, is being rolled out as officials try to diagnose mental illness more consistently across the military services. The Army, which has come under fire for failing to determine which soldiers are unfit to remain on duty, ordered a review in May of how its doctors diagnose psychiatric disorders.

The 2009 Fort Hood shootings by an Army psychiatrist that killed 13 intensified concerns that the military was allowing disturbed individuals to serve in uniform. The widely-reported suicide of Pvt. Danny Chen last October raised racially-charged questions from Asian American advocacy groups, and was a black eye for the military.

The algorithms developed under the DARPA program would derive data from a person’s brain chemistry and behavior, and deliver a snapshot of the individual’s frame of mind. The technology, if successfully developed, could be used to identify which soldiers need extra psychiatric monitoring. It could plausibly be integrated with lie-detector technology to determine if contractors and soldiers are fit for deployment. The goal is “objective classification of individuals who are at risk of committing suicide, within a reduced screening time and with less reliance on physician expertise,” a contracting notice says.

Briefings on the program will be held in Arlington, Va., on Oct. 19; a request for proposals is expected to be released soon.

Geoffrey Ling, who has worked on the critical care team at Walter Reed Army Medical Center, leads the program. He has also spearheaded efforts at DARPA to study brain injuries from improvised explosive devices and develop predictive technology to determine the best treatments for individuals.

Threatwatch Alert

Credential-stealing malware / User accounts compromised / Software vulnerability

Android Malware Infects More than 1M Phones, Adds 13,000 Devices a Day

See threatwatch report


Close [ x ] More from Nextgov

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Featured Content from RSA Conference: Dissed by NIST

    Learn more about the latest draft of the U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology guidance document on authentication and lifecycle management.

  • PIV- I And Multifactor Authentication: The Best Defense for Federal Government Contractors

    This white paper explores NIST SP 800-171 and why compliance is critical to federal government contractors, especially those that work with the Department of Defense, as well as how leveraging PIV-I credentialing with multifactor authentication can be used as a defense against cyberattacks

  • Toward A More Innovative Government

    This research study aims to understand how state and local leaders regard their agency’s innovation efforts and what they are doing to overcome the challenges they face in successfully implementing these efforts.

  • From Volume to Value: UK’s NHS Digital Provides U.S. Healthcare Agencies A Roadmap For Value-Based Payment Models

    The U.S. healthcare industry is rapidly moving away from traditional fee-for-service models and towards value-based purchasing that reimburses physicians for quality of care in place of frequency of care.

  • GBC Flash Poll: Is Your Agency Safe?

    Federal leaders weigh in on the state of information security

  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.