recommended reading

Scientists question accuracy of iris scanners over time

A passenger undergoes iris scanning at Boston's Logan Airport during a test program.

A passenger undergoes iris scanning at Boston's Logan Airport during a test program. // Lisa Poole/AP fil photo

Scientists at the University of Notre Dame have discovered that iris scanners have a higher error rate when used over time for biometric matching, a new study shows.

The research highlights that irises alter with age and the accuracy of sensors degrade with time, challenging a long-held expectation that once a person is enrolled in a biometric program, the system will recognize them for life. This could prompt agencies to consider using various biometric technologies and ID verification methods in tandem to ensure the reliability of matches.

Samuel Fenker and Kevin Bowyer, researchers at the university’s computer science and engineering department, collected iris scans from 322 subjects using an LG 4000 sensor from spring 2008 through spring 2011.

They compared the error rate of iris matches captured recently against those collected further back in time. They found “clear and consistent evidence of a template aging effect” -- the error-rate in biometric systems over time -- “that is noticeable at one year and that increases with increasing time lapse,” their research paper said. A spokesman at device-maker LG Electronics did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

The research comes as officials at the Homeland Security Department consider branching out from fingerprint matching to iris and facial recognition for identity verification at borders and airports, Nextgov reported Friday. They plan to test the technologies at the Border Patrol station in McAllen, Texas.

The Army and the Afghan government have built a database of digital records of more than 2.5 million people in the country. The biometric program is likely to grow following the implementation of scanners at all border crossings in Afghanistan last year.

Threatwatch Alert

Thousands of cyber attacks occur each day

See the latest threats


Close [ x ] More from Nextgov

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Featured Content from RSA Conference: Dissed by NIST

    Learn more about the latest draft of the U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology guidance document on authentication and lifecycle management.

  • PIV- I And Multifactor Authentication: The Best Defense for Federal Government Contractors

    This white paper explores NIST SP 800-171 and why compliance is critical to federal government contractors, especially those that work with the Department of Defense, as well as how leveraging PIV-I credentialing with multifactor authentication can be used as a defense against cyberattacks

  • Toward A More Innovative Government

    This research study aims to understand how state and local leaders regard their agency’s innovation efforts and what they are doing to overcome the challenges they face in successfully implementing these efforts.

  • From Volume to Value: UK’s NHS Digital Provides U.S. Healthcare Agencies A Roadmap For Value-Based Payment Models

    The U.S. healthcare industry is rapidly moving away from traditional fee-for-service models and towards value-based purchasing that reimburses physicians for quality of care in place of frequency of care.

  • GBC Flash Poll: Is Your Agency Safe?

    Federal leaders weigh in on the state of information security

  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.