Last week the Veterans Affairs Department announced it had granted a six-month extension on the IT contract for its Financial Services Center in Austin, Texas. The reason? The contract expired at the end of September, and without the extension, the VA could not pay the bills for its medical centers.
The VA said it had an "urgent and compelling need" to award $2.6 million to incumbent contractor RDI Systems/KGS Inc. of San Antonio for continued IT support at the Austin Center, as it had not finished the work on a new five-year contract for the center with the General Services Administration.
If this is so urgent and compelling, why wasn't someone compelled enough to get a new contract in place before the old one expired?
Bob Brewin
Bob Brewin joined Government Executive in April 2007, bringing with him more than 20 years of experience as a journalist focusing on defense issues and technology. Bob covers the world of defense and information technology for Nextgov, and is the author of the “What’s Brewin” blog.
JOIN THE DISCUSSION
By using this service you agree not to post material that is obscene, harassing, defamatory, or otherwise objectionable. Although Nextgov does not monitor comments posted to this site (and has no obligation to), it reserves the right to delete, edit, or move any material that it deems to be in violation of this rule.