recommended reading

Hearing: VBA Changed Dates on Claims to Make Them Look New

“We are concerned at how quickly the number of [regional offices] with allegations is occurring,” Linda Halliday said.

“We are concerned at how quickly the number of [regional offices] with allegations is occurring,” Linda Halliday said. // Cliff Owen/AP

The Veterans Benefits Administration changed dates on claims to make them appear new, manipulated data, and misplaced and possibly shredded thousands of claims documents, VBA employees and the Department of Veterans Affairs inspector general told a House VA committee last night.

VBA employees who testified at the epic hearing, which started 7:30 p.m. Monday and ended 12:57 a.m. Tuesday, also depicted VBA as an organization focused on narrow production goals designed to eliminate the claims backlog rather than doing quality work. Testimony also highlighted reported workplace retaliation -- including termination -- if VBA employees raised quality issues.

Linda Halliday, assistant inspector general for audits and evaluations, told the hearing the IG had confirmed reports from the Philadelphia VA regional office that dates on some overlooked and misplaced claims files had been updated with the date they were found, rather than the date they were submitted

Halliday told the hearing her office had received complaints of similar practices from employees at VA regional offices in Baltimore, Little Rock, Los Angeles and Oakland.

“We are concerned at how quickly the number of [regional offices] with allegations is occurring,” she said.

Allison Hickey, VA undersecretary for benefits, said this resulted from a now rescinded May 2013 memo to update claims with the date they were found or “discovered" -- a practice she called “pro-veteran,” as it sped up processing. Compensation to veterans, however, starts from the date the claim was originally filed, not at a later “discovered” date.

Kristen Ruell, an authorization quality services representative at the Philadelphia regional office, said she discovered 96 boxes containing what she estimated were thousands of claims files headed for the shredder. Ruell could not say for sure they were shredded because that would have required her to climb aboard the shredding truck, which another employee told her might lead to her shredding.

Hickey could not definitively tell the hearing whether those 96 boxes were shredded, but did surmise they were awaiting disposal after the paper files were scanned into the Veterans Benefits Management System.

In a related development, the IG reported yesterday 9,500 documents and 80 claims folders were found inappropriately stored in a supervisor’s office, delaying the processing of those claims.

Javier Soto, executive vice president of the American Federation of Government Employees union at the St. Petersburg, Florida, VBA regional office, said he wrote and circulated a memo June 24 critical of quality-control procedures at that office. He told the hearing he was terminated June 30 because his “services were no longer needed,” with no explanation for cause.

Rep. Doug Lamborn, R-Colo., repeatedly pressed Hickey to explain Soto’s firing and detail how many VBA employees are terminated without explanation. Hickey said she learned of Soto’s firing at the hearing, found it unusual and promised to get back to the committee with details on the termination.

Hickey had a good-news story for the committee on reduction of the claims backlog, which she said dropped 55 percent from a peak of 611,000 in March 2013 to 275,000 yesterday. Committee Chairman Jeff Miller, however, did not buy that silver lining. He told Hickey and her colleagues at the hearing that based on IG reports and witness testimony, “I don’t believe anyone [from VBA] is telling me the truth about the claims backlog.”

Threatwatch Alert

Thousands of cyber attacks occur each day

See the latest threats


Close [ x ] More from Nextgov

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • It’s Time for the Federal Government to Embrace Wireless and Mobility

    The United States has turned a corner on the adoption of mobile phones, tablets and other smart devices, outpacing traditional desktop and laptop sales by a wide margin. This issue brief discusses the state of wireless and mobility in federal government and outlines why now is the time to embrace these technologies in government.

  • Featured Content from RSA Conference: Dissed by NIST

    Learn more about the latest draft of the U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology guidance document on authentication and lifecycle management.

  • A New Security Architecture for Federal Networks

    Federal government networks are under constant attack, and the number of those attacks is increasing. This issue brief discusses today's threats and a new model for the future.

  • Going Agile:Revolutionizing Federal Digital Services Delivery

    Here’s one indication that times have changed: Harriet Tubman is going to be the next face of the twenty dollar bill. Another sign of change? The way in which the federal government arrived at that decision.

  • Software-Defined Networking

    So many demands are being placed on federal information technology networks, which must handle vast amounts of data, accommodate voice and video, and cope with a multitude of highly connected devices while keeping government information secure from cyber threats. This issue brief discusses the state of SDN in the federal government and the path forward.

  • The New IP: Moving Government Agencies Toward the Network of The Future

    Federal IT managers are looking to modernize legacy network infrastructures that are taxed by growing demands from mobile devices, video, vast amounts of data, and more. This issue brief discusses the federal government network landscape, as well as market, financial force drivers for network modernization.


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.