recommended reading

Why Does the Air Force Spend Twice as Much to Hack than to Deflect Threats?

Personnel of the 624th Operations Center, located at Joint Base San Antonio - Lackland, conduct cyber operations.

Personnel of the 624th Operations Center, located at Joint Base San Antonio - Lackland, conduct cyber operations. // United States Air Force file photo

The House on Thursday approved legislation that breaks out $13.4 million for Air Force cyberattack operations and $5.6 million for efforts to defend the service's networks.

But those numbers likely underrepresent cyber offense and especially cyber defense spending, some military budget analysts say. The problem with cyber funding -- governmentwide -- is that it's hard to define what cyber is, they note. 

"What they are splitting out here is really just a portion of what they are doing for cyber offense and defense," said Todd Harrison, director of defense budget studies at the Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments. "I think it's the part that's more focused on specific adversaries around the world."

The House’s version of the 2015 National Defense Authorization Act would spend a total of $67 million on Cyber Command offensive and defensive activities. The command oversees all Defense Department cyber operations. 

"I expect that if you did a true accounting of what DOD is spending on cyber, it would be in the billions" of dollars, Harrison said. 

The $5.6 million Air Force cyber defense number likely lowballs funding because the service, like nearly every Defense component, struggles to categorize cyber programs in that area, he said. Defensive operations include protecting military pay, accounting, and logistics systems, as well as websites and other servers and networks.

As for reserving $13.4 million for Air Force cyber strike activities alone, Harrison said, just a little tongue-in-cheek, "DOD can't do anything for less than $10 million.”

Armed Services Committee’s members applauded the Air Force for submitting a funding request that differentiated budget lines for offensive and defensive operations. 

"The committee is aware that this was done to consolidate the funding activities in these areas into single program lines to allow for rapid technology development and deployment for offensive and defensive tools," they said. "The committee commends the Air Force for being proactive in consolidating its activities, providing transparency in oversight for Congress while also allowing for rapid acquisition on the part of the Air Force."

The Air Force's budgeting approach "is a model for program management and oversight” that should be “emulated by the other services and Defense agencies,” as much as possible, the lawmakers said. 

Threatwatch Alert

Thousands of cyber attacks occur each day

See the latest threats

JOIN THE DISCUSSION

Close [ x ] More from Nextgov
 
 

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from Nextgov.com.
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

    Download
  • Featured Content from RSA Conference: Dissed by NIST

    Learn more about the latest draft of the U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology guidance document on authentication and lifecycle management.

    Download
  • PIV- I And Multifactor Authentication: The Best Defense for Federal Government Contractors

    This white paper explores NIST SP 800-171 and why compliance is critical to federal government contractors, especially those that work with the Department of Defense, as well as how leveraging PIV-I credentialing with multifactor authentication can be used as a defense against cyberattacks

    Download
  • Toward A More Innovative Government

    This research study aims to understand how state and local leaders regard their agency’s innovation efforts and what they are doing to overcome the challenges they face in successfully implementing these efforts.

    Download
  • From Volume to Value: UK’s NHS Digital Provides U.S. Healthcare Agencies A Roadmap For Value-Based Payment Models

    The U.S. healthcare industry is rapidly moving away from traditional fee-for-service models and towards value-based purchasing that reimburses physicians for quality of care in place of frequency of care.

    Download
  • GBC Flash Poll: Is Your Agency Safe?

    Federal leaders weigh in on the state of information security

    Download

When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.