recommended reading

Army Commanders Nix Key Satellite Communications System

Soldiers from the 2nd Brigade Combat Team, 101st Airborne Division utilize Warfighter Information Network-Tactical Increment 2-equipped vehicles.

Soldiers from the 2nd Brigade Combat Team, 101st Airborne Division utilize Warfighter Information Network-Tactical Increment 2-equipped vehicles. // U.S. Army

Army tactical company commanders universally panned satellite communications equipment installed on their vehicles in tests last year, the Pentagon’s test organization has reported.

The Soldier Network Extension portion of the Army’s Warfighter Information Network  – Tactical, or WIN-T, was developed by General Dynamics C4 Systems to provide voice and broadband satellite communications to tactical vehicles while on the move.

After tests last year at Ft Bliss, Texas, and White Sands Missile Range N.M., “fifteen of fifteen company commanders found the SNE distracting and indicated they would not take it to war,” J. Michael Gilmore, director of operational test and evaluation for the Defense Department, said in an annual report submitted to Congress and released last Thursday.

“The SNE was useful for conducting Voice over Internet Phone calls but the utility of VoIP was limited by long call set-up times,” the test report said. “The SNE’s startup and shutdown procedures were complex, lengthy and required the vehicle to be at-the-halt.”

Congress slashed $204 million from the Army’s $974 million WIN-T funding in the 2014 budget signed by the president on Jan. 16.

Get the Nextgov iPhone app to keep up with government technology news.

Threatwatch Alert

Thousands of cyber attacks occur each day

See the latest threats


Close [ x ] More from Nextgov

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Featured Content from RSA Conference: Dissed by NIST

    Learn more about the latest draft of the U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology guidance document on authentication and lifecycle management.

  • PIV- I And Multifactor Authentication: The Best Defense for Federal Government Contractors

    This white paper explores NIST SP 800-171 and why compliance is critical to federal government contractors, especially those that work with the Department of Defense, as well as how leveraging PIV-I credentialing with multifactor authentication can be used as a defense against cyberattacks

  • Toward A More Innovative Government

    This research study aims to understand how state and local leaders regard their agency’s innovation efforts and what they are doing to overcome the challenges they face in successfully implementing these efforts.

  • From Volume to Value: UK’s NHS Digital Provides U.S. Healthcare Agencies A Roadmap For Value-Based Payment Models

    The U.S. healthcare industry is rapidly moving away from traditional fee-for-service models and towards value-based purchasing that reimburses physicians for quality of care in place of frequency of care.

  • GBC Flash Poll: Is Your Agency Safe?

    Federal leaders weigh in on the state of information security

  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.