recommended reading

Los Alamos Accused of Disregarding Security During VIP Visits

Los Alamos National Laboratory

A Los Alamos National Laboratory employee with responsibility for site security is charging that the facility suspended some safety procedures during VIP visits in 2011, and then after he complained about the practice retaliated against him because of his outspokenness, the Albuquerque Journal reported.

In a lawsuit filed in federal court Wednesday against the nuclear-weapons laboratory in New Mexico, Michael Irvin alleges he was demoted from his job as a security manager in the LANL director's office after he criticized to his bosses the practice of lifting certain unspecified security practices at the laboratory during spring and summer 2011 visits to the site by important individuals.

Irving's lawsuit asserts he has the right to criticize breaches of laboratory security practices that impact safety around nuclear-weapon materials. His suit claims he has been punished for his whistle-blowing with lost wages and benefits and that he was branded a "troublemaker" and "malcontent" by his manager.

The Los Alamos' public information office did not return the Journal's requests for comment.

The laboratory is home to a number of sensitive nuclear-weapons projects such as the production of plutonium triggers that initiate warhead explosions.

The security practices of the broader U.S. nuclear-weapons complex -- which includes sites in Nevada, Tennessee, New Mexico and California -- has come under heightened scrutiny in the last year following the high-profile summer 2012 break-in by peace activists of a secured area of the Y-12 National Security Complex. Laboratories and other facilities that play a role in maintaining the U.S. nuclear arsenal are overseen by the Energy Department's semiautonomous National Nuclear Security Administration.

Threatwatch Alert

Thousands of cyber attacks occur each day

See the latest threats


Close [ x ] More from Nextgov

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

  • Featured Content from RSA Conference: Dissed by NIST

    Learn more about the latest draft of the U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology guidance document on authentication and lifecycle management.

  • PIV- I And Multifactor Authentication: The Best Defense for Federal Government Contractors

    This white paper explores NIST SP 800-171 and why compliance is critical to federal government contractors, especially those that work with the Department of Defense, as well as how leveraging PIV-I credentialing with multifactor authentication can be used as a defense against cyberattacks

  • Toward A More Innovative Government

    This research study aims to understand how state and local leaders regard their agency’s innovation efforts and what they are doing to overcome the challenges they face in successfully implementing these efforts.

  • From Volume to Value: UK’s NHS Digital Provides U.S. Healthcare Agencies A Roadmap For Value-Based Payment Models

    The U.S. healthcare industry is rapidly moving away from traditional fee-for-service models and towards value-based purchasing that reimburses physicians for quality of care in place of frequency of care.

  • GBC Flash Poll: Is Your Agency Safe?

    Federal leaders weigh in on the state of information security


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.